A Better Sequence (TM DVP)

[Colin Crow]

Special Treatment? Rowland threw the investigation into the realm of conspiracy by making a claim that he had never made before. He forced them to pursue the truth about his claim.

Ultimately Rowland claimed there was two people in the SN. Of course the WC investigators were going to react and investigate him and his claim. His WC testimony was erratic at best. The WC members obviously would have noted his multiple answers to the same question. Nothing in his testimony would lead you to believe he was a credible witness. The WC members saw and heard it first hand.

Can you post where he claimed that there were two people in the SN?

[Alan Ford]

Rowland wasn’t the only one who claimed to see two people there. It’s not at all a bizarre claim.

Don't you get it, Mr Iacoletti? Any witness claim that is not congruent with the official story is, by definition, bizarre. Sheesh 

[Walt Cakebread]

Don't you get it, Mr Iacoletti? Any witness claim that is not congruent with the official story is, by definition, bizarre. Sheesh 

That's a fact!.... And The bastroids have succeeded in making the term Conspiracy Theorist a synonym for a simpleton and a fool.....   "Conspiracy Theorist" has become part of the American vernacular, thanks to LBJ, who viewed us as mere pissants.....

Many of the really bizarre theories were created by LNer's pretending to be CT's.....

[Jack Nessan]

What's really going on is Jack Nessan is desperately trying to discredit Arnold Rowland.....  And even though Rowland made statements that were inaccurate, he DID know the rifle that he saw in the hands of the man behind the sixth floor window was a SPORTING RIFLE ( high powered rifle , or hunting rifle) with a large telescopic sight..... and it was NOT a military rifle with a full wooden stock like a Mannlicher Carcano.

Perhaps Jack Nessan simply wants to belittle Rowland and display his" superior knowledge", which is common for a know-it-all....... 

The bottom line is;... BOTH Arnold Rowland and Howard Brennan said that the rifle that they saw in the hands of a man who was wearing light colored clothing was a HIGH POWERED RIFLE.... and definitely NOT a Military rifle.

"And even though Rowland made statements that were inaccurate,"

There you go. Now you understand. Not a few, but a lot

Rowland's own testimony discredits him. He repeatedly embellished, fabricated and changed his story.

[Walt Cakebread]

"And even though Rowland made statements that were inaccurate,"

There you go. Now you understand. Not a few, but a lot

Rowland's own testimony discredits him. He repeatedly embellished, fabricated and changed his story.

Arnold Rowland saw a big game hunting rifle ( Routinely used as "sniper rifles" ) in the hands of a man who was standing behind a sixth floor window at the west end of the TSBD. The man was  dressed in light colored clothing....      The MAJOR point that Rowland made was the fact that the rifle was NOT a military rifle, like a Mannlicher Carcano.

[Jack Nessan]

You do know the difference between a Big game hunting rifle and a military rifle like a Mannlicher Carcano Don't you?....

--------------------------------

Yes. One starts with a B and the other with an M.

Thank you....  I believe you've got it....LOL!

Yes. One starts with a B and the other with an M. What do you think is the difference?


Do you identify with Rowland? You too are always pretending to know about firearms to make some strange point.

[Jack Nessan]

Again, what difference does it make with regard to the people he saw?

Brennan embellished the hell out of his story as time went on. Do you then disregard everything he reported?

He fabricates endless stories but he gets the people right?

[Jack Nessan]

Businesses that mock their customers don’t tend to stay in business.

But letting fools handle guns brings in business?