3 x 5 Index Card that is item # 14 On the List

[Gary Craig]

WRONG!!  WAKE UP!!...   and start using your head......  It's obvious that a photocopy of the original list that was created on 11-22-63 was used to create the evidence list for 11-26-63.    ( Even a 10 year old can understand that, by comparing the TWO lists..( the original from 11-22-63, and the altered photocopy of that list that was altered on 11-26-63)    Now since the altered copy from 11-26-63, DOES NOT HAVE  the addendum about the Paraffin test...then obviously that addendum on the original list had to have been added to the original list AFTER 11-26-63.   And it's very obvious that the addendum about the paraffin test was added by using a different typewriter.

The paraffin cast results were left off the second evidence list because the cheek cast was negative and showed he hadn't fired a rifle.

Why would they go back and add it to the 1st list after the exculpatory results were known?

Dump the bong water in the toilet. It's not for drinking.

[Walt Cakebread]

The paraffin cast results were left off the second evidence list because the cheek cast was negative and showed he hadn't fired a rifle.

Why would they go back and add it to the 1st list after the exculpatory results were known?

Dump the bong water in the toilet. It's not for drinking.

Why would they go back and add it to the 1st list after the exculpatory results were known?

Simple.... The answer...  Because they wanted it to appear that the original list had been created AFTER 11-23-63 because that damned "Palm Print" was listed on the original list and they ( both the FBI and the DPD)  had lied and said that Day and the DPD had not told them about the Palm Print  ...but the original list from 11-22-63, clearly had that palm print listed. THUS had desperately had to fool suckers like you into believing that the original list was NOT created on 11-22-63.

And as PT Barnum once observed.....There's a sucker born somewhere every minute.

[Gary Craig]

Why would they go back and add it to the 1st list after the exculpatory results were known?

Simple.... The answer...  Because they wanted it to appear that the original list had been created AFTER 11-23-63 because that damned "Palm Print" was listed on the original list and they ( both the FBI and the DPD)  had lied and said that Day and the DPD had not told them about the Palm Print  ...but the original list from 11-22-63, clearly had that palm print listed. THUS had desperately had to fool suckers like you into believing that the original list was NOT created on 11-22-63.

And as PT Barnum once observed.....There's a sucker born somewhere every minute.

So instead of typing a date on the list they add a piece of exculpatory evidence that was discovered after the list was typed?

You need to let go of this and admit your mistake.

Time to move on.

[John Iacoletti]

Simple.... The answer...  Because they wanted it to appear that the original list had been created AFTER 11-23-63 because that damned "Palm Print" was listed on the original list and they ( both the FBI and the DPD)  had lied and said that Day and the DPD had not told them about the Palm Print

How utterly circular.

But why would the "lying FBI and DPD" want to conceal the existence of a palmprint that they wanted to use as evidence against Oswald for several days and deliberately make its provenance as dodgy as possible?

[Walt Cakebread]

How utterly circular.

But why would the "lying FBI and DPD" want to conceal the existence of a palmprint that they wanted to use as evidence against Oswald for several days and deliberately make its provenance as dodgy as possible?

why would the "lying FBI and DPD" want to conceal the existence of a palmprint

They said that the palm print had been found by Lt Day on the evening of 11-22-63, but the DPD never told the FBI that Day had found that so called Palm print.

However the evidence list shows that they HAD in fact told the FBI about the so called Palm Print and when the FBI received that print they reported that it was a smudge and worthless for identification purposes.    This was one of the primary reasons they had to backtrack and send the evidence back to Dallas ....What better way to create confusion?? ......

[Walt Cakebread]

All the items on the list, huh?  Perhaps you can identify where in this photo you see the rifle, the cardboard boxes, the paraffin test, the Connally bullet fragments, and Day's magic partial palmprint.

All the items on the list, huh?

Duh...You need to read.   I never said that all of the items on the list are in the photo.....

[John Iacoletti]

I never said that all of the items on the list are in the photo.....

Are you admitting that you're so ignorant and uninformed that you've never seen the evidence photo that shows all of the items that are on the list?

[Walt Cakebread]

Ok, so you've found an error....  I'm human, I make errors, but....All of the items in the photo are on the list.