3 x 5 Index Card that is item # 14 On the List

[John Iacoletti]

Here’s the back of that photo, from the FBI files. It’s dated 11/26. This was the evidence sent to the FBI the second time.

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62276#relPageId=71&tab=page

[Walt Cakebread]

Here’s the back of that photo, from the FBI files. It’s dated 11/26. This was the evidence sent to the FBI the second time.

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62276#relPageId=71&tab=page

So you acknowledge that they photographed the evidence on 11-26-63 but deny that they photographed the evidence on 11-22-63....in spite of the fact that they would have been impossible to photograph the paper bag in the undamaged condition on 11-26-63, because the FBI destroyed the paper bag in testing on 11-23-63.

[Thomas Graves]

So you acknowledge that they photographed the evidence on 11-26-63 but deny that they photographed the evidence on 11-22-63....in spite of the fact that they would have been impossible to photograph the paper bag in the undamaged condition on 11-26-63, because the FBI destroyed the paper bag in testing on 11-23-63.

*unable ?

[Walt Cakebread]

*unable ?

Go wallow in the mud, Tommy......

[Walt Cakebread]

So you acknowledge that they photographed the evidence on 11-26-63 but deny that they photographed the evidence on 11-22-63....in spite of the fact that they would have been impossible to photograph the paper bag in the undamaged condition on 11-26-63, because the FBI destroyed the paper bag in testing on 11-23-63.

The FACT remains....Item number 14 on the original list that was typed up on 11-22-63 is:......1 Partial Palm print "off underside gun barrel near end of foregrip " on rifle C2766

[John Iacoletti]

So you acknowledge that they photographed the evidence on 11-26-63 but deny that they photographed the evidence on 11-22-63....in spite of the fact that they would have been impossible to photograph the paper bag in the undamaged condition on 11-26-63, because the FBI destroyed the paper bag in testing on 11-23-63.

How do you know that the bag in the 11/26 photo hasn't already been processed with silver nitrate?  It looks darkened to me.

[John Iacoletti]

The FACT remains....Item number 14 on the original list that was typed up on 11-22-63 is:......1 Partial Palm print "off underside gun barrel near end of foregrip " on rifle C2766

The fact remains that you have no evidence that this list was typed up on 11-22-63.

[Thomas Graves]

The fact remains that you have no evidence that this list was typed up on 11-22-63.

Iacoletti,

In your humble opinion, what would constitute "evidence" here (hypothetically speaking, of course)?

A film showing the list being made ... with a wall calendar in the background?

LOL