YAWN! 
So as suspected, you "conveniently" never give your opinion and instead just act all high and mighty and holier-than-thou by just shooting down anyone who gives theirs. Considering your non-committal to either camp, it's odd how you only really seem to refute LNs arguments with your "FACTS! FACTS!" stance.
As said previously, there are very little concrete, set in stone FACTS on the case which is why forums like this exist and why it has been possible for thousands of varying books to written on the case.
Everyone knows that and nobody really tries to present arguments as FACTS on here. It's their opinion followed by why they think that. You're the only one that takes everything so literal. You really need to take that stick out of your arse and chill out. Criticising people for how they word something rather than for what they're actually saying is boring and that's all I really see you do.
And do people really still use the twisting and turning magic bullet theory as an argument? I was under the impression that went out about the same time as the argument that the world was flat.
you "conveniently" never give your opinion and instead just act all high and mighty and holier-than-thou by just shooting down anyone who gives theirs.Why should I give you or anybody else an opinion I don't have? Just to please you, so you have something to attack? Why not simply try to discuss something, or have you never learned how to do that? All your hyperbolic crap aside, I don't shoot anyone down who gives their opinion. I ask questions to find out how solid the opinion is and I can't help it when that theory then falls apart.
Just how much is an opinion worth if it can be shot down that easily?
Considering your non-committal to either camp, it's odd how you only really seem to refute LNs arguments with your "FACTS! FACTS!" stance.First of all, that's not true. And secondly it's not odd at all. The LN arguments very often, if not always, equal the official narrative, so that's the place to start. I play devil's advocate to determine how solid the evidence is. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen, whiny little man!
Btw, what's your problem with facts? Don't you like them, can't you deal with them, or do you simply prefer to ignore them to make up your own reality?
As said previously, there are very little concrete, set in stone FACTS on the case which is why forums like this exist and why it has been possible for thousands of varying books to written on the case. Thank you for admitting that there are very few facts in this case. Yet you still defend a narrative that is based on hardly any facts at all. Why is that?
Everyone knows that and nobody really tries to present arguments as FACTS on here.For a relatively new member that's a bold statement. I am not sure who "everyone" is, but you are dead wrong about nobody trying to present arguments as facts. It happens all the time. In fact, you just did it by unqualified claiming "everybody knows" when there is no way in the world you could possibly know that. You also did it in your previous post when you falsely claimed that "Even the majority of CTs have long dismissed the magic bullet argument and acknowledge that Oswald (most likely) shot bullet CE399 from the 6th floor TBD window."
It's their opinion followed by why they think that. You're the only one that takes everything so literal.That's simply not true.
Criticising people for how they word something rather than for what they're actually saying is boring and that's all I really see you do.I don't give a damn if you think it's boring or not, but words and how they are presented matter. Your buddy "Mytton" for example constantly misrepresents evidence by wording something in a certain way and other LNs on this board play word games all the time.
And do people really still use the twisting and turning magic bullet theory as an argument? I was under the impression that went out about the same time as the argument that the world was flat.Which only shows just how uninformed and naive you really are.
