Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The "smirk"  (Read 33725 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #160 on: December 12, 2019, 06:58:17 PM »
Advertisement
Beverly Oliver said she wore a babushka. We see a babushka lady at the scene. You got info of a second babushka at the scene, Bubba?

There was nothing in Tatum’s account that couldn’t have been gleaned from just reading the WC volumes.

Are you claiming that's what he did? Maybe curb your enthusiasm until you prove that.

But you never know; you lot can never be too sure, huh..
« Last Edit: December 12, 2019, 07:22:39 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #160 on: December 12, 2019, 06:58:17 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #161 on: December 12, 2019, 07:21:45 PM »
I didn’t “attempt to scandalize” you. What does that even mean?
>>> So now you do remember what you said to me. Thanks so much for clearing that up.

And what did you say to me first, hypocrite? Bullies always cry the loudest when they get a taste of their own medicine.

And why do you keep trying to drag religion into a JFK assassination discussion in the first place? Because your conclusions about it are authority and faith-based?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #162 on: December 12, 2019, 07:23:22 PM »
... and?

... and so how is Tatum’s reference to a red car evidence that he was actually there?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #162 on: December 12, 2019, 07:23:22 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #163 on: December 12, 2019, 07:44:47 PM »
... and so how is Tatum’s reference to a red car evidence that he was actually there?

[Note that I edited that post before I read this]



Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #164 on: December 12, 2019, 08:10:32 PM »
And what did you say to me first, hypocrite? Bullies always cry the loudest when they get a taste of their own medicine.

And why do you keep trying to drag religion into a JFK assassination discussion in the first place? Because your conclusions about it are authority and faith-based?

You're the gaslighter around here

Go ahead and link to what I said to you first in this particular matter

You assume that I'm Catholic, the ones with certain cover-up problems
How convenient

Further, you assume that I'm a believer in religious dogma

JFK's religion has been a focal point in the assassination

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #164 on: December 12, 2019, 08:10:32 PM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #165 on: December 12, 2019, 09:27:26 PM »
Quote
Quote
Threads, and/or Posts considered to be motivated by Sectarianism, will be deleted.
Forum rules
sectarianism...excessive attachment to a particular sect or party, especially in religion.
There is no particular value in citing church or religion at this point IMHO

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3776
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #166 on: December 12, 2019, 11:21:11 PM »
Is that supposed to be evidence that it was Tatum?


It is evidence that your "sum total" was derived using "biased math."

Here is more (from Dale Myers) http://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2018/11/jack-ray-tatum.html:

The likely reason for Tatum’s presence on Tenth Street surfaced during a May 17, 1986, telephone interview conducted by Katie Pearson with former HSCA investigator John Moriarty, Jr.

Moriarty recalled that he had “spent a great many weeks trying to locate” Jack Ray Tatum after receiving a tip. Moriarty told Pearson that HSCA investigators had “interviewed over 300 local residents and shop owners around the Oak Cliff area, scene of the Tippit shooting, to try to find new witnesses. Moriarty was told of Tatum by a jeweler.” No doubt, the jeweler was the merchant at Gordon’s Quality Jewelers. [7]

According to Moriarty, the jeweler told him that on the day of the assassination, “Tatum was in the process of buying a precious stone and couldn’t decide whether he could afford it so he went for a drive around the block, taking time to come to a decision. It was on this drive that he witnessed the murder of Tippit.” [8]

Given the jeweler’s account, Tatum’s actions on November 22nd suddenly make sense. Leaving Gordon’s Quality Jewelers in the 300 block of west Jefferson, Tatum headed east contemplating the potential jewelry purchase. He had traveled about 7/10ths of a mile (a five-minute drive under normal conditions) when he reached the intersection of Jefferson and Denver – the moment he apparently had made up his mind about the purchase. He then turned north onto Denver and west on Tenth, with the intention of circling the block and heading back to the jeweler. Unfortunately, his return journey was interrupted by the murder he witnessed on Tenth Street.

[7] Telephone conversation, Katie Pearson with John Moriarty, Jr., Saturday, May 17, 1986, p.1
[8] Telephone conversation, Katie Pearson with John Moriarty, Jr., Saturday, May 17, 1986, p.1

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #167 on: December 13, 2019, 12:11:32 AM »
Forum rules
sectarianism...excessive attachment to a particular sect or party, especially in religion.There is no particular value in citing church or religion at this point IMHO

My posts here are not motivated by sectarianism
They are motivated by Iacoletti's charges

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "smirk"
« Reply #167 on: December 13, 2019, 12:11:32 AM »