Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof

[Steve Barber]

  Enough said.

[John Iacoletti]

Redundant thread.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2303.0.html

[Steve Barber]

Redundant thread.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2303.0.html

 I don't reside here, John, therefore hadn't the slightest idea someone had already posted a thread.   No harm in reposting it, though.  Facts are facts, after all.

[Steve Barber]

No problems, Steve. John I. thinks he's the Forum Nanny.

BTW, Mytton started the "56 years later" topic on Nov. 22 and the critics paraphrased it in a new topic a day later.

  Thank you, Jerry.  I'm not surprised that the critics paraphrased  Mr. Mytton's thread.  I saw their's which prompted me to post this one. 

[John Iacoletti]

Great, let’s post a hundred threads then, all stating that you all haven’t been able to prove in the last 56 years that Oswald did it. Because, you know repetition is awesome.

[Paul May]

Reasonable people believe Oswald the shooter and nobody else. Oswald working for somebody? We don’t know and never will.

[Martin Weidmann]

Reasonable people believe Oswald the shooter and nobody else. Oswald working for somebody? We don’t know and never will.

Reasonable people believe Oswald the shooter and nobody else.

Dumb, narrow minded and unreasonable people say what you just said.

[Jerry Freeman]

What would it take to actually prove that there was a conspiracy anyway? ....especially after 56 years