This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument

[John Iacoletti]

“For a forensic science to be scientifically valid, you need actual, empirical evidence of its reliability and accuracy, period,” said Eric S. Lander, founder of the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT. “Historically that hasn’t been the case.” “

Exactly right. Which is why unscientific and biased handwriting “analysis” of 2 block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of a 2-inch order coupon from microfilm that is now “missing” is not a reliable indicator of who placed an order.

[John Iacoletti]

Who else besides the FBI do you figure was in on The Conspiracy?

Who else besides you has stopped beating your wife?

Graves — get a life.

[Thomas Graves]

Who else besides you has stopped beating your wife?

Graves — get a life.

Is that an example of your "epistemology," Iacoletti?

--  MWT 

[Thomas Graves]

Exactly right. Which is why unscientific and biased handwriting “analysis” of 2 block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of a 2-inch order coupon from microfilm that is now “missing” is not a reliable indicator of who placed an order.

John,

What makes you think it was unscientific?

Because the results weren't what you hoping for?

If the results had been "probably not Oswald," would you have been happy with that?

--  MWT 

PS  Why the quotation marks around missing?

Do you think it was intentionally lost by the evil, evil Deep State?

[John Iacoletti]

Is that an example of your "epistemology," Iacoletti?

No, it’s an example of what you do every day on this forum.

[John Iacoletti]

Another reason why “FBI said so” is not a good argument:

https://forejustice.org/wc/mayfield/jd/brandon_mayfield_jd_issue25.htm

[Thomas Graves]

No, it’s an example of what you do every day on this forum.

How large was the conspiracy, John?

--  MWT 

[John Iacoletti]

How large was the conspiracy, John?

How large was the stick you used to beat your wife, Thomas?