Only if you pre-assume that there was a "first shot" that missed everything else. This is a good example of making the evidence fit your argument.
My original response here on the Tague hit was to Lloyd Morris who stated :
"If Mary Woodward was correct and the first shot missed [and likely hit James Tague near the triple underpass "If you think that you can present a reasonable case that Tague was hit by the first shot then, by all means, go ahead.