Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy

[Lee Wotton]

His autopsy was not illegal. The Secret Service officers suspected that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. A conspiracy would have made it a Federal crime. They were justified under Title 18 , Part 1, Chapter 19 of the US Code in removing the body from Dallas.

Hahahahaha so a LNer uses a conspiracy when it suits him hahaha

They didn't suspect they knew, they drove him into the ambush, slowed down and removed protection and ignored rules about vehicle speed and high rise buidings with windows open.

Suspicion was not enough t lawfully do what they did that's why they had to threaten and aim to draw weapons

[Lee Wotton]

Lee, if you really want to get back on topic you can start by properly replying to my original response to your OP.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,233.msg4917.html#msg4917

I've got a better way Tim, ignore your nonsense and discuss with others who can produce evidence and answer questions in the OP

[Royell Storing]

His autopsy was not illegal. The Secret Service officers suspected that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. A conspiracy would have made it a Federal crime. They were justified under Title 18 , Part 1, Chapter 19 of the US Code in removing the body from Dallas.

 The above is laughable. Unless the assassination occurred inside Germany during Hitler's reign, the SS did Not have the authority to deem themselves Judge/Jury and take possession/steal the body of JFK.

[Tim Nickerson]

And the purpose of that would would be?

The purpose of what? Your question doesn't make sense.

[Tim Nickerson]

Hahahahaha so a LNer uses a conspiracy when it suits him hahaha

They didn't suspect they knew, they drove him into the ambush, slowed down and removed protection and ignored rules about vehicle speed and high rise buidings with windows open.

Suspicion was not enough t lawfully do what they did that's why they had to threaten and aim to draw weapons

You're being idiotic. There wasn't a conspiracy but they didn't know that shortly after 1 pm.

[Tim Nickerson]

I've got a better way Tim, ignore your nonsense and discuss with others who can produce evidence and answer questions in the OP

Just as I suspected. You're not interested in discussing the evidence. You cannot do so in an intelligent manner.

[Tim Nickerson]

The above is laughable. Unless the assassination occurred inside Germany during Hitler's reign, the SS did Not have the authority to deem themselves Judge/Jury and take possession/steal the body of JFK.

Were the Secret Service Agents ever charged with illegally removing the body from Dallas? If not, then shut your yap. They were justified under Title 18 , Part 1, Chapter 19 of the US Code in removing the body from Dallas.

[Tim Nickerson]

Are you actually referring to this?
but I don't see a date before 1971

U.S. Code ? Title 18 ? Part I ? Chapter 18 ? ? 351
Congressional, Cabinet, and Supreme Court assassination, kidnapping, and assault; penalties

(f) If Federal investigative or prosecutive jurisdiction is asserted for a violation of this section, such assertion shall suspend the exercise of jurisdiction by a State or local authority, under any applicable State or local law, until Federal action is terminated.

(Added Pub. L. 91?644, title IV, ? 15, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1891; amended Pub. L. 97?285, ?? 1, 2(a), Oct. 6, 1982, 96 Stat. 1219; Pub. L. 99?646, ? 62, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3614; Pub. L. 100?690, title VII, ? 7074, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4405; Pub. L. 103?322, title XXXII, ? 320101(d), title XXXIII, ?? 330016(1)(K), (L), 330021(1), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2108, 2147, 2150; Pub. L. 104?294, title VI, ? 604(b)(12)(C), (c)(2), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3509; Pub. L. 112?87, title V, ? 506, Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1897.)

I'm referring to 18 U.S.C. ? 372. It was first enacted in the 1860s.

Conspiracy to Impede or Injure an Officer of the United States, 18 U.S.C. ? 372
https://www.justice.gov/file/21261/download

"Unlike the more general conspiracy provision, 18 U.S.C. ? 371, that was enacted in much its present form in 1867, ? 372 did not even contain a requirement that an overt act be done in furtherance of the conspiracy before the conspiratorial conduct would become actionable. The broad purpose of protecting the Federal presence as fully as possible therefore supports a broad, rather than narrow, reading of the word ?office.?