https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=594#relPageId=4&tab=page
Do you accept the autopsy photos (#1 to #52) inventoried in 1966 by James Humes, Thornton Boswell, John Ebersole, and John Stringer as being authentic? Yes or no.
I'm not concerned whether or not they're authentic.
I don't have the access, photographic experience or tools to make such a determination.
I'm pointing out that critical photos of the wounds don't exist in the archive.
The wound the autopsy doctors and WC said was slightly above and slightly to the right of the EOP
on JFK's skull was moved 4 inches by the Clark Panel and adopted by the Rockefellor Commission, and
the HSCA.
The EOP photos aren't there to confirm the location of the wound. Very convenient when it needs to be moved to support the official narrative. A narrative that had come under close scrutiny and criticism
The description of the location of the wound in JFK's back was edited by Jerry Ford to become
a neck wound and align with Arlen Spector's Magic Bullet theory in the final draft of the WCR.
A photo that could have could shown the course and direction of the Magic Bullet disappeared.
Here is the Attorney General, in a taped phone call, telling LBJ they don't have the photo of JFK's right lung.
The one Humes testified was taken.http://www.jfklancer.com/Clark.LBJ.htmlDate: 1-21-67 12:00 Noon
Time: 7 mins 25 secs at the end of a 8 mins 31 secs conversation
Phone Conversation between Acting Attorney General Ramsey Clark and President Lyndon Johnson
Re: Autopsy Photos
-snip-
"That is, there may be a photo missing. Dr. Humes, Commander and Naval doctor, testified before the Warren Commission that this one photo made of the highest portion of the right lung."
-snip-
"It could be contended that that photo could show the course and direction the bullet that entered the lower part of the neck and exited the front part."
-snip-
"We are left with one specific problem. Dr. Humes did testify before the Warren Commission there was such a photo [that]
we don't have."-snip-