It's astounding that anyone would argue that a note written in Russian, found in a book belonging to the Oswalds that references military papers, a PO box, a baby, and paying rent could have been written by someone other than a member of the Oswald household. A great example of the attempted application of the impossible standard of proof to conjure up fake doubt. Who could this mystery person have been who left such a note in a book belonging to the Oswalds? We are left to ponder as no explanation is forthcoming. For example, how many folks in Texas could write a note in Russian? How many of those had access to this book in the Oswald household? How many also had a baby, PO box, paid rent and served in the military? How many of these anticipated being arrested or killed? How and why would this fantasy person leave such a note in a book belonging to the Oswalds? It is ludicrous. Only Oswald matches the criteria and circumstances relating to the note. It didn't float down from the heavens into that book. No explanation - much less any evidence - has been provided to support the notion that anyone else matches the relevant criteria contained in the note and how/why it would end up in a book in the possession of the Oswalds. It just could be so because Dishonest John doesn't like the implications. Entertaining what is merely possible (even if wildly improbable and completely baseless) over what the facts and circumstances demonstrate is nearly certain. This is just the classic rabbit hole nonsense designed to go round and round. Nothing could ever be "proven" using that standard which is the entire purpose. Imagine suggesting that no logical inference can ever be drawn from such a note. And arguing it would need to be dated, signed, and reference the intent to murder Walker to be evidence relating to that crime. Wow. And, of course, if Oswald had left such a note our resident contrarian would argue that handwriting is not a science etc. And on and on into eternity.
