Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.  (Read 105796 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3881
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #216 on: March 05, 2020, 11:37:35 PM »
Advertisement
And the definition of a statement came from the dictionary, not from my opinion.

You decided, in your opinion, that it fitted the definition of a statement.

I didn't say that you should have written anything. The point of all the adjectives was to show what an unclear statement might look like. And to point out that your sentence did not contain any of the adjectives that would make it unclear what your opinion was. Are you really so dense that you didn't get that?

Okay, clever dick... enlighten us all. When I said I seriously doubt it.... what exactly was the opinion I was expressing?

I have already stated how the sentence does fit the definition of a statement. I see no point in repeating myself. What exactly do you think disqualifies your sentence as a statement.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #216 on: March 05, 2020, 11:37:35 PM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #217 on: March 05, 2020, 11:42:46 PM »
I have already stated how the sentence does fit the definition of a statement. I see no point in repeating myself. What exactly do you think disqualifies your sentence as a statement.

Yeah, that's what I thought... You can't explain it... at least not in any credible way. So, you do the next best thing, by "answering" with a question in a pathetic attempt to turn the thing around.... Classic LN!

You just lost the argument.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2020, 11:44:44 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3881
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #218 on: March 05, 2020, 11:45:30 PM »
Yeah, that's what I thought... You can't explain it... at least not without exposing that what you have is merely your opinion.

You just lost the argument.


No, you can't answer the question. You lost.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #218 on: March 05, 2020, 11:45:30 PM »


Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #219 on: March 05, 2020, 11:53:25 PM »
Ok , glad that’s all cleared up lol
Now back to the bag and why there is only one palm print on the edge and no fingerprints of the four fingers on the reverse side of bag

It’s like the bag or paper the bag was made from was laying on Fritz office table and Oswald while having  hands handcuffed behind was backed up to that table and placed one of his hands, palm side down on edge of desk on top the paper


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #220 on: March 05, 2020, 11:59:21 PM »

No, you can't answer the question. You lost.

More classic LN... resorting to playing childish games.



« Last Edit: March 06, 2020, 12:01:51 AM by Martin Weidmann »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #220 on: March 05, 2020, 11:59:21 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3881
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #221 on: March 06, 2020, 12:15:48 AM »
Frankly, I'm surprised you didn't put in "most likely".

You were trying to make the case that his doubt over a claim which indicated a state of mind was no different than your positive claim about a state of mind.  That they somehow both constitute "acting like you knew something about his frame of mind".  They don't.

So what's the big deal then if Martin doubts it?


You were trying to make the case that his doubt over a claim which indicated a state of mind was no different than your positive claim about a state of mind.



No I wasn't. Martin tried to imply that I was. But that isn't what I said. Here is the sequence:

Martin stated his opinion and asked for my opinion about his opinion:

But that would be hell of a way to "conceal" a rifle he had just used in an attempted murder, don't you think?

Here is my response (I didn't agree with Martin's opinion and stated some reasons why):

Even in today’s paranoid world with all the security measures, etc., people travel with firearms. As long as they aren’t in their carry-on items they are permissible. And there wasn’t exactly an active dragnet of police activity looking for Walker’s attacker when LHO traveled to New Orleans. So, no..,

Here is Martin's response (He argues that the point is about Oswald's frame of mind. And then Martin explains what his opinion is regarding what Oswald's frame of mind would not have been.):

You are missing the point. Sure, many people travel with firearms, but how many of those have just used that weapon to shoot somebody? It's about Oswald's frame of mind. Having just tried to kill a man with that rifle, would he risk transporting it in a duffelbag with the barrel sticking out? I seriously doubt it....

But it is once again clear that you are using biased speculation to try to shape the narrative towards your own opinion.

Now, if you believe Martin was not "acting like he knew something about Oswald's frame of mind, then please explain how you arrived at that conclusion.




Fast forward to - I said:

No one has said that it was anything but conjecture.

you responded:

So what's the big deal then if Martin doubts it?

There is no big deal about it. And this argument is a prime example of why no one should engage either one of you. Endless nonsense and a waste of time. Ending in ridiculous accusations...
« Last Edit: March 06, 2020, 12:17:05 AM by Charles Collins »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3881
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #222 on: March 06, 2020, 12:41:03 AM »

Was Oswald allegedly worried or not? In other posts...they have him scared and running away to New Orleans :-\
Make up my mind!

Marina said that she was scared. And I think her fears influenced LHO’s decision to go to New Orleans. But I haven’t seen any evidence that LHO was scared. At least not after LHO determined that the news reports of the attack on Walker suggested that no one was suspicious of him. However, Marina did say that LHO had nervous shaking episodes while he slept. But these also occurred before the attempt on Walker. So, in my opinion, LHO wasn’t worried enough for his fears to be the main reason he moved to New Orleans.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3881
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #223 on: March 06, 2020, 12:48:53 AM »
Ok , glad that’s all cleared up lol
Now back to the bag and why there is only one palm print on the edge and no fingerprints of the four fingers on the reverse side of bag

It’s like the bag or paper the bag was made from was laying on Fritz office table and Oswald while having  hands handcuffed behind was backed up to that table and placed one of his hands, palm side down on edge of desk on top the paper

You missed the point. What was LHO’s frame of mind?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #223 on: March 06, 2020, 12:48:53 AM »