Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.  (Read 106090 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #312 on: March 09, 2020, 12:08:14 AM »
Advertisement
Since there are many idiots in this group....I have used the word...but I don't recall ever saying "any idiot" can see such and such.

WOW

You just used 'idiot' yet again in relation to the carrying of the bag method. Unbelievable. The hits just keep-on-a comin'

And try to keep your whataboutisms confined to your 'group' where they clearly belong.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2020, 12:21:31 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #312 on: March 09, 2020, 12:08:14 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #313 on: March 09, 2020, 02:47:44 AM »

Let’s try another question that might shed some light. Who first dusted CE 142 for fingerprints?

Robert Lee Studebaker.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #314 on: March 09, 2020, 02:56:37 AM »
Robert Lee Studebaker.

Did Studebaker fingerprint CE142 before the rifle was found?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #314 on: March 09, 2020, 02:56:37 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #315 on: March 09, 2020, 03:07:22 AM »
Did Studebaker fingerprint CE142 before the rifle was found?

I don't know. Probably not.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #316 on: March 09, 2020, 03:30:03 AM »
The bag was carried at full length in order to limit any further smearing of prints.
Quote
Mr. BALL - What did the package look like?
Mr. FRAZIER - Well, I will be frank with you, I would just, it is right as you get out of the grocery store, just more or less out of a package, you have seen some of these brown paper sacks you can obtain from any, most of the stores, some varieties, but it was a package just roughly about two feet long.
Quote
Mrs. RANDLE. What I remember seeing is about this long, sir, as I told you it was folded down so it could have been this long.
Mr. BALL. I see. You figure about 2 feet long, is that right?
Mrs. RANDLE. A little bit more.
Mr. BALL. A little more than 2 feet.
 
 


 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #316 on: March 09, 2020, 03:30:03 AM »


Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #317 on: March 09, 2020, 03:47:25 AM »
I don't know. Probably not.

Do you think Studebaker opened it up, fingerprinted it, then refolded it and placed it in the SE corner prior to Johnson and Montgomery first noticing it?

If not then it has to be after the rifle was found. Do you agree?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #318 on: March 09, 2020, 03:58:41 AM »
Do you think Studebaker opened it up, fingerprinted it, then refolded it and placed it in the SE corner prior to Johnson and Montgomery first noticing it?

If not then it has to be after the rifle was found. Do you agree?

He and Day got to the TSBD at 1:12 and the rifle was found at 1:22. That makes it unlikely that he dusted the bag before the rifle was found.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #319 on: March 09, 2020, 04:32:37 AM »
He and Day got to the TSBD at 1:12 and the rifle was found at 1:22. That makes it unlikely that he dusted the bag before the rifle was found.

So you believe, like me, that the observation of the bag as variously described by Montgomery and Johnson took place after 1.22pm?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #319 on: March 09, 2020, 04:32:37 AM »