Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.

[Martin Weidmann]

With all the evidence he left everywhere he might as well have walked out of work with the damn rifle in his hand.

He was out-voted by his support team Alex Hidel, OH Lee, and Dirty Harvey. 

So it was a democratic conspiracy?

Who, me? Nah, I was at a Looney Bin searching for Stephen King's time-disrupter closet

It surely has a ring of truth to it....

[John Iacoletti]

LOL  Are you messing with me?  Who said Oswald ordered a rifle under the name A. Hidell? Clearly it was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns, but it didn't stop the police & FBI from claiming it happened, right? Or I'm I mistaken?

That didn't answer the question.  Who said the rifle was supposed to be brand new?

[Walt Cakebread]

LOL  Are you messing with me?  Who said Oswald ordered a rifle under the name A. Hidell? Clearly it was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns, but it didn't stop the police & FBI from claiming it happened, right? Or I'm I mistaken?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle

https://harveyandlee.net/Mail_Order_Rifle/Mail_Order_Rifle.html

https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKSmannlicher.htm

https://nypost.com/2013/11/19/oswald-rifle-yard-virtually-the-same-since-1963/

Should I go on?  Apparently all the Oswald swallowers who believe everything the habitual lying cops & government say, think it's true. Personally I know better. But swallowers swallow everything, except the truth, which they usually label conspiracy theories.  lol

Whenever there's an abundance of evidence at every turn, people should be skeptical.  Because people who commit crimes aren't usually gonna leave bread crumbs with directions to their house, their birth certificates, drivers licenses, lots of finger prints and a giant neon sign that say's "here I am!"  I mean at some point it becomes a little too obvious. But maybe it's just me. I don't know.

I mean seriously... who the hell is going to pose with a rifle while holding up a communist manifesto? Unless they just wanna get caught and are trying to make sure that everyone knows it's them. "Here's my guns... and my communist bible, just in case I shoot the president one day.." lol   

"I'm gonna order a rifle under a fake name, but make sure it comes to my p.o. box under my real name...because why not?"  And grown ass men are like.. "Oh  yeah... sounds legit!" smh 

With all the evidence he left everywhere he might as well have walked out of work with the damn rifle in his hand.

who the hell is going to pose with a rifle while holding up a communist manifesto? Unless they just wanna get caught and are trying to make sure that everyone knows it's them. "Here's my guns... and my communist bible,

Question:.....Who is going to pose with a rifle while holding up communist literature?? 

Answer:..... Someone who wants Castro to believe that he's a armed and ready communist revolutionary, who attempted to shoot  Castro's most vocal foe.

Lee intended for that photo to "fall into the hands"of the police ( and consequently the newspapers) where it would be published along with the story about the attempt on General Walker's life.

[Richard Smith]

It's hard to buy the sack story when the rifle found isn't even the same one as in the backyard photo. If there was 2 rifles then there had to be some funny spombleprofglidnoctobuns going on. Just look at the shoulder straps for both and you'll see the difference.

And his rifle was supposed to be brand new, right? Yet the Military said it was barely functional.

Does that sound like a new rifle to anyone?

And something else that makes no sense...  Oswald was a trained Marine. Doesn't anyone think a Marine would find a better spot, like the roof? Oswald could have easily gone to the roof. It's a better view, not to mention concealment. It just doesn't make sense.

If the rifle was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns, then the bag was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns too.

Google can be a terrible instrument in the hands of fools.  Give up trying to think for Oswald. Or better yet thinking at all.  Oswald worked in that building.  He found a great shooting location.  The wall around the roof was too high for him to shoot over. 

Mr. BAKER - We went out on the roof.
Mr. BELIN - What did you do on the roof?
Mr. BAKER - I immediately went around all the sides of the ledges up there, and after I got on top I found out that a person couldn't shoot off that roof because when you stand up you have to put your hands like this, at the top of that ledge and if you wanted to see over you would have to tiptoe to see over it.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

It's hard to buy the sack story when the rifle found isn't even the same one as in the backyard photo. If there was 2 rifles then there had to be some funny spombleprofglidnoctobuns going on. Just look at the shoulder straps for both and you'll see the difference.

And his rifle was supposed to be brand new, right? Yet the Military said it was barely functional.

Does that sound like a new rifle to anyone?

And something else that makes no sense...  Oswald was a trained Marine. Doesn't anyone think a Marine would find a better spot, like the roof? Oswald could have easily gone to the roof. It's a better view, not to mention concealment. It just doesn't make sense.

If the rifle was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns, then the bag was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns too.

How did you conclude the rifle found in the building wasn't the one in the backyard photos? Because the shoulder straps were different? It's not possible that Oswald just used a different strap? How does a different STRAP equal a different RIFLE? I don't understand that at all.

Who said the rifle was brand new? Where did the "Military" say it was barely functional?

Where are you coming up with this information?

[Richard Smith]

How did you conclude the rifle found in the building wasn't the one in the backyard photos? Because the shoulder straps were different? It's not possible that Oswald just used a different strap? How does a different STRAP equal a different RIFLE? I don't understand that at all.

Who said the rifle was brand new? Where did the "Military" say it was barely functional?

Where are you coming up with this information?

Careful you are dealing with a "genius."

[Martin Weidmann]

Google can be a terrible instrument in the hands of fools.  Give up trying to think for Oswald. Or better yet thinking at all.  Oswald worked in that building.  He found a great shooting location.  The wall around the roof was too high for him to shoot over. 

Mr. BAKER - We went out on the roof.
Mr. BELIN - What did you do on the roof?
Mr. BAKER - I immediately went around all the sides of the ledges up there, and after I got on top I found out that a person couldn't shoot off that roof because when you stand up you have to put your hands like this, at the top of that ledge and if you wanted to see over you would have to tiptoe to see over it.

Give up trying to think for Oswald.

Coming from you, that's rich!

[Richard Smith]

Give up trying to think for Oswald.

Coming from you, that's rich!

Two geniuses on the same forum.  What are the odds?