Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?  (Read 60612 times)

Offline Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #432 on: April 19, 2020, 05:07:58 PM »
Advertisement
Craig was not referring to when Alyea was filming Fritz examining the carcano. Why do you keep claiming he was?

Craig didn't know about the Alyea footage when he began making his claims about a mauser. If he had known that footage existed, he would not have told lies!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #432 on: April 19, 2020, 05:07:58 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #433 on: April 19, 2020, 05:22:44 PM »
Roger Craig claimed that he saw that "Stamped right there on the barrel "7.65 Mauser,  when Capt Fritz was examining the carcano. Craig said that he wasn't more than six or eight inches from the rifle, and he saw stamped right there on the barrel ---"7.65 Mauser".

Cite that

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #434 on: April 19, 2020, 05:58:01 PM »
Craig didn't know about the Alyea footage when he began making his claims about a mauser. If he had known that footage existed, he would not have told lies!

I believe that you're right.    But the film has Roger Craig superimposed on it and Roger is saying that he saw "stamped right there on the barrel was the inscription "&.65 Mauser"

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #434 on: April 19, 2020, 05:58:01 PM »


Offline Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #435 on: April 19, 2020, 07:12:30 PM »
Roger is saying that he saw "stamped right there on the barrel was the inscription "&.65 Mauser"

He didn't say that until many years later. Never said it at all at the WC.

Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #436 on: April 19, 2020, 11:26:16 PM »
He didn't say that until many years later. Never said it at all at the WC.

Didn't 2 deputy sheriffs say the same thing? One being deputy sheriff Seymour Weitzman, who wrote in his report the next day that he found a 7.65 Mauser?  Three men with firearms experience all claimed the same thing. What are the odds? Clearly evidence was being planted all around. So isn't plausible that there could have really been a Mauser?

How many other rifles were seen at the TBD that day?

Here's a Remington Model 8 .. why was it there? https://photos.app.goo.gl/HBy3YVL2NffW9GNt8

What need did the police have for bringing rifles into the TBD? There were plenty of cops with handguns, right?

Is this another rifle in the TBD between boxes? https://photos.app.goo.gl/mVjHy5SG8XHWkXYU7

This guy has a rifle (or maybe a shotgun) https://photos.app.goo.gl/Uz1FoKrL8DNoWifQ6

And there's evidence of 2 Carcano's  https://photos.app.goo.gl/bNNQv5MiFtn9sK7t7

So how far fetched is it that there could have been a Mauser? 3 different cops said they saw a Mauser. 2 changed their story. The 1 who didn't was fired. Seriously... How much more evidence do people need in order to see the fuckery involved?
« Last Edit: April 19, 2020, 11:37:23 PM by Izraul Hidashi »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Shells, rifle, SN... Who?
« Reply #436 on: April 19, 2020, 11:26:16 PM »