Oswald set-up the Sniper's Nest/Nook. That was his Only designated function that day. He worked there, handled/moved boxes there, and could perform this task without drawing attention to his actions. He was instructed to wait inside the TSBD Breakroom for any further instructions that might be needed. Otherwise, he was supposed to stay at the TSBD and finish his work shift or depart if the workers were dismissed early due to the shooting. It is absurd to believe that Oswald descended the stairs, and after entering the vestibule, decided to turn Left and enter the Breakroom. After entering the vestibule, turning Right would have taken Oswald to a hallway which then would have led him Directly to a stairway going Down and Out of the TSBD. Filling book orders inside the TSBD meant Oswald knew the lay-out of the TSBD like the back of his hand. There is No Way a shooter makes the choice to confine himself in a Breakroom or any 4 sided room for that matter. He stays on the Move seeking Escape. (The carcano was stolen from the Paine garage and planted at the TSBD)
Hey, Martin. Thanks for responding. I know you have had many a heated argument with LN's since you were here but there are some who do admit there are some troublesome areas. I don't want to mention their names but one is bothered as to how Oswald smuggled in the wrapping paper from the TSBD
when Frazier brought him home that Thursday. In other words why not the question ... do you remember
if he was wearing a jacket that day and if so ... was it zipped up to the top. Another when he was unaccounted for a short period of time between Tippit and the Texas Theater. As for meeting the LN's halfway. I don't know a better way to put it. He was either a Patsy - involved with another or a team
or - he acted alone. If I can't accept the Patsy conclusion then what's left but to meet the LN's halfway?
This debate of the complete or partial guilt of Oswald as opposed to his complete innocence reminds me of the Creationists and Evolution argument. The last groups state they have the theory which is backed up by science. Not perfect but backed up by science. The former states that's it's said in a Holy Book with no way to measure the science of it. Not yet anyway. So who has to move to who? Esp if I do believe there was some degree of guilt as far as Oswald is concerned.
Btw ... I agree with you, Hell may have to freeze over twice before we might even get an answer
In the meantime - and this is only my opinion - all we can do is state a plausible theory which meets
both groups in the middle. If evidence was doctored or added there had to be a good reason for doing it.
One nut job Socialist would be no different than two. If there were others there had to be a good reason why it would have appeared that one did it.
