Am I the only CT here who can meet the LN's more than half way? If not ...

[Michael O'Brian]

Jerry, is that the same Mick that was all about the Irish, JFK being Irish and all. There was a Mick O' brien which looked like a fake name to me, given the lowercase 'b'

Yes squire that would be me!! now I am remodified and have a new spelling with a capital B and an a replaces the e.
Well someone has to educate you brainwashed  eegits, and yes eegit is a word it can be used in scrabble.

[John Anderson]

Is that the same guy who claimed The British Royal family had Kennedy killed because he was catholic?

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Is that the same guy who claimed The British Royal family had Kennedy killed because he was catholic?

Yes, and the same person who said LBJ killed JFK in order to stop the passage of civil rights.

This, of course, is the same LBJ who told the nation after the assassination that the "first thing" the country needed to do to honor Kennedy was pass civil rights.

The same civil rights legislation that he supposedly stopped by killing JFK.

And he then proceeded to work with Dr. King to pass that legislation in July of 1964.

That doesn't make a lick of sense except in certain sections of JFK conspiracy world where up is down and down is up and everybody killed JFK or was involved except poor old Oswald.

[Michael O'Brian]

Is that the same guy who claimed The British Royal family had Kennedy killed because he was catholic?

Yes squire I think I implicated those bad ass royals and a few belonging to their Government agencies, it was a protestant backed assasination, so you should have no doubts that british ancestory were in the thick of the planning and cover up.

[Michael O'Brian]

Yes, and the same person who said LBJ killed JFK in order to stop the passage of civil rights.

This, of course, is the same LBJ who told the nation after the assassination that the "first thing" the country needed to do to honor Kennedy was pass civil rights.

The same civil rights legislation that he supposedly stopped by killing JFK.

And he then proceeded to work with Dr. King to pass that legislation in July of 1964.

That doesn't make a lick of sense except in certain sections of JFK conspiracy world where up is down and down is up and everybody killed JFK or was involved except poor old Oswald.

I also said that LBJ only carried on with the civil rights bill to appease African Americans into fighting in Vietnam.

[John Anderson]

Yes squire I think I implicated those bad ass royals and a few belonging to their Government agencies, it was a protestant backed assasination, so you should have no doubts that british ancestory were in the thick of the planning and cover up.

[Michael O'Brian]

Thanks squire I am glad that we both agree on something too, the obvious protestant supported murder is written all over this case.

[Zeon Wasinsky]

No. This is one LNer who does not accept this conspiracy theory. Because if it is true than the following people were all involved in the conspiracy:

** Buell Frazier ? who agreed to move over one hundred miles to move in with his sister?s family. Without this, the job for Oswald would not be discovered.

** Linnie Randle ? who invited Buell Frazier to come live with her family. Without this, Buell Frazier would never get a job in the Dallas area.

** Dorothy Roberts ? who invited some neighbors to come over for coffee. Without her, Ruth Paine would not meet Linnie Randle.

** Ruth Paine ? who, at Dorothy Roberts little get together, apparently discovered a possible job for Oswald at the TSBD.

Plus, we need a few other people involved. Like the husband of Linnie Randle. And the Employment agency that steered Buell Frazier to a job at the TSBD. And Mr. Truly, the TSBD supervisor, because if he doesn?t hire both Buell Frazier and Oswald, the whole intricate plot falls apart.

Question:

Am I to believe that all these people were part of this conspiracy?

Am I to believe everyone in Texas was a part of this conspiracy?




No conspiracy that selects Oswald to take part before mid-October 1963, makes sense.

none of those people have to be involved with Harold Byrd, the owner of TSBD. He might have found out by periodic review of employee list for his building, and discovered the name Oswald, and thought to himself, "I wonder if this is same Oswald that I read about who defected to the USSR? Then its just matter of finding out some more information about Oswald thru some inside source from CIA or FBI, which Bryd could have access too, via having friends like LBJ.