I posted a video of someone who was (1964).How many other experts disagreed with your "expert".... Isn't it a fact that several other experts swore that the bullets could NOT be traced to that big bore, short barrel, revolver ??
That's what people without any good evidence always say.
Yes. 7 other firearms experts for the WC and HSCA to be exact. But of course the LNers cite Nicol.
Name "the experts" who swore that the bullets could NOT be traced to that big bore, short barrel, revolver
AND swore that the bullets could be absolutely excluded from that gun based on having different class characteristics?
No it is not vague. The man takes 70 seconds to explain the difficulty of the ballistics match of the projectiles.
I'm not going list all the points he made. You need to rebut Joseph D. Nichols conclusions point-by-point: Otherwise you're just another contrarian.
Incidentally, your brief, incorrect statement is actually "vague" too. What irony!
The Video concludes with text stating: "Joseph D. Nicol's expert ballistics evidence SUPPORTS other evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald murdered Office J.D. Tippit".
I provided evidence: Audio/visual testimony on video.
According to you: Every piece of evidence (without exception) is NOT good evidence.
You ignored the "class characteristics" question.