Oswald’s Seaport Trader Order Coupon Mystery Solved

[Joe Elliott]

True Adventures. The case of the boiled bride. It’s interesting to find out what Marxist intellectuals like to read.

[John Mytton]

Solving the Mystery of Oswald’s Seaport Trader Order


Edited to provide the direct link for the proper format.

Thanks Tim, this officially puts to rest the silly arguments that the coupon description was for a different revolver.

JohnM

[Tim Nickerson]

Thanks Tim, this officially puts to rest the silly arguments that the coupon description was for a different revolver.

JohnM

I can't take any real credit for it John. Other than lighting a fire under Steve Roe and a couple of others. Roe called it the find of a decade. I won't go that far but it is a rather big one.

[John Mytton]

I can't take any real credit for it John. Other than lighting a fire under Steve Roe and a couple of others. Roe called it the find of a decade. I won't go that far but it is a rather big one.

It would be nice if Caprio was still around, because now that we can see the ad that accompanies the coupon there is no need to make wild speculation. For instance just 1 example, the "St. W." was obviously someone who misinterpreted someone else's shorthand of "S + W", but Caprio was never impressed with my LNer interpretation of the evidence and instead insisted that "St. W." was for some other weapon which unfortunately was never identified. Go figure.

JohnM

[Tim Nickerson]

It would be nice if Caprio was still around, because now that we can see the ad that accompanies the coupon there is no need to make wild speculation. For instance just 1 example, the "St. W." was obviously someone who misinterpreted someone else's shorthand of "S + W", but Caprio was never impressed with my LNer interpretation of the evidence and instead insisted that "St. W." was for some other weapon which unfortunately was never identified. Go figure.

JohnM

I have a way of letting him know. I might just do that.

[John Iacoletti]

For instance just 1 example, the "St. W." was obviously someone who misinterpreted someone else's shorthand of "S + W",

“Obviously”. 

[John Mytton]

“Obviously”. 

Yep, obviously and guess what, as per usual, I was absolutely 100% correct. Sorry bout ruining your dreams, Troll!







JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Yep, obviously and guess what, as per usual, I was absolutely 100% correct. Sorry bout ruining your dreams, Troll!

“Mytton” is under the delusion that the advertisement somehow demonstrates that “someone misinterpreted someone else’s shorthand”.