Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance  (Read 13094 times)

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #40 on: June 17, 2020, 10:44:52 PM »
Advertisement
Holland explains the lack of a dent on the mask arm was because the bullet struck at a shallow-angle strike. However, this would mean minimal deflection. But Holland wants a major deflection from the mask arm to make the bullet (or fragments from it) go down Elm Street towards the manhole cover and bridge.



Holland's graphic.



Haag experiment showing minimal deflection from glancing shot trajectory.
 

    Myers 3D projection showing amount of deflection
    needed to make Holland's theory work.

Dear Jerry,

Holland believes the bullet glanced the mast arm sufficiently hard to cause it to lose its copper jacket, thereby explaining why the bullet smear found on the curb by Tague had no copper in it.

Holland also says that a possible reason the hypothesized glancing "dent" on the mast arm couldn't be found some fifty years later was because the mast arm had been repainted five times (iirc) since the assassination, and those coats of sloppily-applied paint had filled in the dent sufficiently as to make it undetectable.

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: June 17, 2020, 10:51:21 PM by Thomas Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #40 on: June 17, 2020, 10:44:52 PM »


Offline John Tonkovich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 732
Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #41 on: June 18, 2020, 01:59:51 AM »
Dear Jerry,

Holland believes the bullet glanced the mast arm sufficiently hard to cause it to lose its copper jacket, thereby explaining why the bullet smear found on the curb by Tague had no copper in it.

Holland also says that a possible reason the hypothesized glancing "dent" on the mast arm couldn't be found some fifty years later was because the mast arm had been repainted five times (iirc) since the assassination, and those coats of sloppily-applied paint had filled in the dent sufficiently as to make it undetectable.

--  MWT  ;)
Holland and Myers. Hacks.

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #42 on: June 18, 2020, 02:14:09 AM »
Holland and Myers. Hacks.

Dear Tonkovich,

Because they don't spew your favorite KGB-based conspiracy theories?

--  MWT  ;)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #42 on: June 18, 2020, 02:14:09 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #43 on: June 19, 2020, 02:15:16 AM »
The authentic autopsy photos show only a bullet sized entrance on the back of Kennedy's head.



The Nix and Zapruder films show matter moving forward and away from Oswald's sniper's nest.


Credit Chris Davidson

JohnM


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #44 on: June 19, 2020, 02:26:56 AM »
The authentic autopsy photos show only a bullet sized entrance on the back of Kennedy's head.

JohnM

The authentic autopsy photos show only a bullet sized entrance on the back of Kennedy's head.

It also shows a completely intact back of the head, when we know that a part of Kennedy's skull was blown away by the explosion.




JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #44 on: June 19, 2020, 02:26:56 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #45 on: June 19, 2020, 04:33:57 AM »
The authentic autopsy photos show only a bullet sized entrance on the back of Kennedy's head.

It also shows a completely intact back of the head, when we know that a part of Kennedy's skull was blown away by the explosion.

I love how you're following me all over the Forum, you might learn something, but as regards to this latest observation you're not a doctor and your opinion is duly noted.

JohnM

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #46 on: June 19, 2020, 04:40:52 AM »
I love how you're following me all over the Forum, you might learn something, but as regards to this latest observation you're not a doctor and your opinion is duly noted.

JohnM

Jacky Kennedy wasn't a doctor either, yet she picked up a piece of the skull from the trunk of the car....

I love how you're following me all over the Forum

Said the guy with an overinflated ego and a massive unjustified sense of self-importance
« Last Edit: June 19, 2020, 04:45:03 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #47 on: June 19, 2020, 04:43:01 AM »
Jacky Kennedy wasn't a doctor either, yet she picked up a piece of the skull from the hood of the car....

Where did Jackie say she picked up a piece of skull from the trunk of the Limo?

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Cowlick Vs Occipital Protuberance
« Reply #47 on: June 19, 2020, 04:43:01 AM »