Yes. And on November 22nd, Baker associated that man with Oswald.
Nope-----the affidavit makes no such linkage. You lose!
That's the whole reason the encounter (the only one in his affidavit) was mentioned at all. Because as Baker went to give his affidavit, he saw Oswald and remembered him from the earlier encounter. Baker got the room level wrong, understandable given he was never in the building before and wasn't making note of the floor level at the time.
"Mr. BAKER - I never did have a chance to see him in the lineup. I saw
him when I went to give the affidavit, the statement that I saw him
down there, of the actions of myself and Mr. Truly as we went into
the building and on up what we are discussing now."
The words you quote disprove your claim: Officer Baker tells us here that he went to City Hall in order "to give the affidavit, the statement" about his encounter & the actions of himself and Mr. Truly. Going in to give his statement, he was already well aware, in retrospect, of the likely significance of the encounter with the man caught walking away from the rear stairway several floors up. That encounter was the chief point of the statement he went in to give.
Baker's affidavit doesn't say the man he encountered in the Depository wasn't Oswald (maybe he didn't know Oswald's name when he made his affidavit).
OK, so all he has to do is say, "I have just seen this man brought into the Homicide Office in custody". Yet he doesn't. You lose!
And we have his testimony that upon seeing Oswald, he was compelled to add detail about the encounter.
Where in his testimony does he say that upon seeing Mr Oswald he was compelled to add detail about the encounter? Or are you just compelled to make this detail up because your argument is so weak?
Otherwise, the encounter was of no significance as it was just a workman vouched for by Roy Truly.
Why would a Depository employee have been incapable of being the gunman? Kindly explain your logic, Mr Organ!
Not at all embarrassing (your semantic gyrations; now that's embarrassing), as Truly vouched for the man. Oswald was unarmed so how was Baker knowingly letting a killer go?
Where are you getting 'knowingly' from, Mr Organ? Learn to read, sir!
The decision to let a man caught walking away from the rear stairway several floors up was a major error of judgment. Again, why would being an employee rule someone out as a gunman?
Hard to believe early press reports would get something garbled up. How about the early press report of the mortally-injured Kennedy being removed from Dealey Plaza in a bus?
Ah, so now you accept that there were indeed---------contrary to your earlier assertion---------multiple reports of a front entrance encounter!
And you obviously can't explain Mr Oswald's own telepathic placing of the encounter just there!
The Fantasy Island reboot will premiere a week from tomorrow. I take it you're booked.
Another weak cope