Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Dan O'meara]

Further from the Weisberg collection:

http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/E%20Disk/Ellis%20Starvis%20Major/Item%2001.pdf

Specifically the last paragraph is rather interesting....

Interesting to say the least. Now I'm going to be spending my evening trying to track down water coolers in the TSBD

[John Iacoletti]

Because her statement to the FBI on 11/26/63 is 'previous' to her WC testimony

yes, 11/26/63 is certainly "previous" to 3/18/64.  That's your basis? 

and it is information given (or 'furnished') to the FBI, hence the phrase "information previously furnished to the F.B.I."
Just to expand on that - the statement given to the FBI on 11/26/63 contained information relating to her "activities and impressions" on 11/22/63 as she states in her CE 1381

So I guess somebody needs a lesson in "necessary" vs. "sufficient".

Either way, CE 1381 does not make any reference to Reid encountering Oswald or a Coke.

[John Iacoletti]

Interesting to say the least. Now I'm going to be spending my evening trying to track down water coolers in the TSBD

[Dan O'meara]

yes, 11/26/63 is certainly "previous" to 3/18/64.  That's your basis? 

So I guess somebody needs a lesson in "necessary" vs. "sufficient".

Either way, CE 1381 does not make any reference to Reid encountering Oswald or a Coke.

Still crying about being schooled John. You're the only one getting any lessons round here. 

[John Iacoletti]

Still crying about being schooled John. You're the only one getting any lessons round here. 

Nice display of arrogance, but that doesn't justify your claim that "information previously furnished to the F. B. I."  is a reference specifically to Reid's FBI statement given on 11/26/63.

[Dan O'meara]

Nice display of arrogance, but that doesn't justify your claim that "information previously furnished to the F. B. I."  is a reference specifically to Reid's FBI statement given on 11/26/63.

Just teasing because you're being so petulant 

[John Iacoletti]

Just teasing because you're being so petulant 

You're the one who gets petulant.  Every time your misinformation gets corrected.

[Dan O'meara]

Unfortunately they forgot "information previously furnished to the F. B. I." in the Carolyn Arnold's statement (page 7 in the CE 1381 bundle) to cover her 12:25 sighting of Oswald -- LOL

This obviously brings us to Arnold's FBI statement four days after the assassination:

"Mrs. R. E. ARNOLD, Secretary, Texas School Book Depository, advised she was in her office on the second floor of the building on November 22, 1963, and left that office between 12:00 and 12:15 PM, to go downstairs and stand in front of the building to view the Presidential Motorcade. As she was standing in front of the building, she stated she thought she caught a fleeting glimpse of LEE HARVEY OSWALD standing in the hallway between the front door and the double doors leading to the warehouse, located on the first floor. She could not be sure that this was OSWALD, but said she felt it was and believed the time to be a few minutes before 12:15 PM.

She stated thereafter she viewed the Presidential Motorcade and heard the shots that were fired at the President; however, she could furnish no information of value as to the individual firing the shots or any other information concerning OSWALD, whom she stated she did not know and had merely seen him working in the building."

The important point is that this has Arnold outside the TSBD @ 12:15pm. This ties in with the CE 1381's of the other employees Arnold was with, three of whom state 12:15 as the time they left the TSBD. This would also seem to tie in with Reid's statement about the younger girls leaving before her, Reid herself getting out in time to stand on the steps "for a few minutes" before the parade came onto Houston.