Richard Smith is a full blown conspiracy theorist making up his own phony scenarios.
I just posted an article that exposed the bogus Hunter Biden smear which the guy behind it admitted he made it all up including a fake computer generated "witness". The only ones who are toast is Benedict Donal.d, his crime family, and his cohorts. They will ALL finally be held accountable for their sedition and crimes after Jan 20th.
Imagine the mind set of a CTer who attempts to discredit others by calling them a CTer while peddling a massive conspiracy theory. An interesting exercise in self loathing and dim self awareness. Here is a question. Which of the following scenarios is a "conspiracy theory"?
A: A crackhead drops his laptop off at the local repair shop and forgets to pick it up.
B: Russian secret agents in cooperation with Rudy Giuliani and many others concoct information on a laptop which they decide to recruit a Hunter-double to leave at a computer store in Delaware. They somehow convince or rely upon the proprietor to look at the contents, find them suspicious, and report them. They also rely on Hunter to not simply clear the matter up by saying it is not his computer. Instead his attorney asks for it to be returned to him.
Here's a hint if you are having trouble. Pay close attention to the underlined part: A "conspiracy" is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime.
Richard Smith is a strong Trump supporter. And I do not like Trump at all. But I don’t see anything in Richard Smith’s posts that indicate that he is a Large-Secret-Enduring Conspiracy Theorist (LSE-CT), for any conspiracy.
Michael Griffith and Allan Fritzke are clearly LSE-CTers. They support that thousands of people secretly made millions of bogus mail-in ballots. And that hundreds of programmers coded the election software to throw the election. These are clearly Large-Secret-Enduring Conspiracy Theories. I hear many parrots over and over again that Richard Smith is a CTer. And perhaps he is. I have not gone over all his posts.
Being a supporter of Trump is very likely wrong. Totally wrong, in my opinion, now that Trump is clearly trying to overturn a popular election. And Richard believes Hunter Biden committed some crime may very well be wrong. But I don’t see how either belief makes Richard a CTer for any LSE-CT.
Question:
Any anyone show a post which shows Richard Smith is an LSE-CTer? By the way, the worst action any President can undertake, short of nuclear war, is overturning a Presidential Election. It is the classic action of a would-be dictator. No other President, Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, Andrew Jackson, none of them, comes within an order of magnitude, as being as bad a president as Trump. For his actions and statements during the last two months alone, he is by far the worst. I don’t see how anyone can still support him for 2024, unless one feels we need a President for Life. Which is what Trump would devote himself to doing if he is somehow elected in 2024.