Another ridiculous conspiracy theory from the people who brought you the "rigged election" nonsense.
Gee, maybe it had something to do with him saying "These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long."
Twitter isn't the government.
Yes, it is. He was inciting violence and insurrection.
oh, please. The guy with the goofy head dress is Jake Angeli, a known QAnon kook, and soon to be federal prisoner.
Yes, all the media outlets carried the video where he told the violent mob how special they are.
I stand corrected. It was Angeli and the other picture was Vos the reporter that was Nancy Pelosi's son-in-law that was caught on same picture with him and used for their own devious purposes. (Correction taken by Iacoletti and Weidmann). Just because I made that statement believing it to be true at the time, doesn't mean that I can't be persuaded by reason and logic. There is a difference between truth and fiction - I have no agenda. I read about the connections after I posted - I question things, most people don't and people assume that news agencies only report truth! That is what all news agencies should be doing, but it doesn't seem to happen!
In the case of Trump inciting violence and insurrection, prove it with his statement? You can't! That is inference and is propaganda!! That aligns with what has happened in the last 4 years. The refusal to accept an election in 2016 leads to intentional division and this was very effectively weaponized in the bi-election in 2018 as Mueller investigated 6 months beyond that. He was effective in flipping house seats. This happened and neither MSM or FBI or Justice department were accountable for their illegal actions, leaks and false FISA warrants and really meddling with an election. Not one person in jail for crimes committed at high levels by politicians like Schiff either.
There should not be a bias in reporting such that you are only allowed to hear one side of the story and not both sides. . Propaganda - lies versus truth should be disputed and questioned and done equally on both left and right sides and used to be done by media. Point made, point taken. I would rather have freedom to form my own opinion, rather than have someone else censoring and make me dig for it. Censoring the POTUS and making unsubstantiated inferences against him is ridiculous. That is like JR shooting LHO and being the great patriot.
Example. If Hunter Biden had a laptop and it contains a pornographic video of him being masturbated by a woman's feet and released - it should not likewise be censored and not newsworthy because it could influence an election. If it contained emails that were seen in Congress and also in possession at the same time by the FBI, there is a problem. If there was an email released that said there was "10 for the Big Guy", it should be just as propagated in news stories as what they did to Trump over the last 4 years. What gives NYT, Facebook or Twitter or FBI or government officials the right to leak materials anonymously and with bias against Republicans to the media. That is not playing fair in my opinion and where 1st amendment right of free speech is being negated and replaced by one sided news (called propaganda) and used to steal elections. What do you think happened in Germany 80 years ago? They controlled their own media and reported to the people. Are we not in danger of this today if no one counteracts. The media was and is to question all corruption without bias and investigate for the people, not for one party alone.
However, can you draw a biased conclusion once more? When you call people special when they are marching for transparent elections and integrity, you cannot then infer that you have now aided and abetted a "violent mob". Once they breached the building, he didn't go tell them to lynch anyone and he has been quoted as actually saying:
"Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!"
That means he was inciting violence? To me, it looks like a false flag event, people were allowed to breach. You wouldn't get into a building if you deployed teargas in the areaI guess it is not much different than a passenger jet airplane going beyond an absolute no-fly zone and crashing into the Pentagon in broad daylight with an air force base beside doing nothing after being given adequate warning of twin tower being hit by hijacked planes! It doesn't make sense unless you are either very stupid and or it is in fact allowed to happen. What happened after that event?