Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2  (Read 467439 times)

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5387
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4864 on: March 20, 2022, 03:03:32 PM »
Advertisement
Why? Because Criminal Donald is a Putin stooge Russian assest.



Tin foil hat nonsense.  If Trump were an "asset" of Putin (what does even mean in human speak) then why didn't Putin invade while Trump was President?   It's laughable to be fixated on Trump over a year after he is no longer president.  And Trump has condemned the Ukraine invasion in unambiguous language.  Rick knows this because I've posted it several times.  It doesn't fit his fantasy narrative, though.  But here it is again:

"The Russian attack on Ukraine is appalling, it's an outrage and an atrocity that should never have been allowed to occur.  We are praying for the proud people of Ukraine. God bless them all."

President Donald J. Trump (statement on 02/26/22)




JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4864 on: March 20, 2022, 03:03:32 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4865 on: March 20, 2022, 10:57:41 PM »
How Joe Biden 're-ignited our government engine' after Donald Trump's damage



What is the source of American power? What, to reclaim a denuded phrase, makes America great? Not the biggest economy, the most powerful military, nor the most coveted cultural icons.

Those are end products, not causes.

They beg the question.

Our strength derives from basic factors: openness to ideas, exchange of argument and ability to process information into good decisions.

If these seem like fuzzy qualities, they’re not.

Economists generally agree our greater capacity to innovate and our superior ability to process complex information in a modern economy won the economic battle of the 20th century. Our relative wealth and qualitative technology advantage flowed into military might.

That combination won the Cold War.

Our federal government plays a central role in that story.

At its best, it reflects the same advantages. That has rarely been clearer than in the way the administration under President Biden has navigated the crisis in Ukraine, displaying forethought and balance, innovating in information warfare, leading and reinvigorating our alliances in Europe, carefully calibrating devastating sanctions, and avoiding disastrous missteps that could lead to World War III.

None of this happened by accident.

Read this description from Max Bergmann, a former senior State Department official, of how our government’s process works (or is supposed to, when it is well-run) in a situation like we face right now:

There are countless inter-agency meetings. There are conversations happening on defense, on military assistance, on sanctions. Experts are exchanging information and ideas.

If State says “we need to turn the screws more on Russia on energy,” Treasury might say, we have some concerns – and then they’ll work together to figure out how to make it work, while someone from Energy will describe where our oil comes from and where we could get other supplies.

Then we might bring in the Middle East experts. Oftentimes there'll be a meeting and then you realize there's like eight other things you need to find out.

Eventually you might develop four different options, but then two options will go up further to the secretaries and the president.

And sometimes the president says “I don't like any of these options, bring me more” and then it kicks back down.

Bureaucratic and even a bit tangled? Sure.

Our system produces plenty of mistakes.

But notice the virtues: the tremendous amount of information we harness, the constructive argument, and the ability to give the big boss information he may not want to hear.

Contrast that with the disconnect, both physical and mental, between Russia’s leader and the system he presides over – whether he is sitting a field goal’s length from his advisors or overseeing a bizarre, fake “exchange of views” before berating the head of his spy service for blowing the pre-arranged script.

So why, as Bill Clinton would say, am I telling you this?

Because few people fully appreciate the true significance of the executive branch agencies in our federal government, how badly former President Trump damaged them and how much value we are thereby getting out of electing Joe Biden as president.

As Michael Lewis showed in his book The Fifth Risk, the federal government is the greatest information collection and processing machine ever devised by humankind for making better decisions and driving a nation’s business and economic success.

Trump Russia-fied it.

He rifled through his rolodex of oligarchs and installed sycophantic bumblers (a man who couldn’t recall the existence of his agency), ideologues compromised by foreign governments, grifters and corporate raiders on the make into key leadership positions.

The most senior leaders seemed to neither know nor care what their job was while experienced government professionals in the levels below stood aghast at the wreckage to good government.

Trump not only failed to leverage the potential of the system (unsurprising from a man who believed that he “alone” could fix things), he pulled a full Putin by outright ignoring the collective smarts of his massive support structure whenever he was seized by a fantastical notion or random whim.

The most famous incidents varied from the comic (think sharpie-hurricane), to the tragi-comic (injecting disinfectant), to the downright tragic (the Syria withdrawal that even leading Republicans called “disastrous” and a “betrayal”).

But the damage went much deeper.

The federal agencies are not just a source of knowledge and idea generation to support decision-making at the top.

They are the workhorses of governing in America.

In fact, given the relative dysfunction of the Congress, executive branch agencies are where most policy affecting people’s lives is made.

And it’s a normal function of any administration to use the might of federal agencies to push through their preferred policy agenda.

So even when Trump wasn’t filling the government with incompetence or larceny, his agencies were still implementing a lot more policy with real consequences than people realize.

The internet is replete with lists (here’s a great example) of how much happened each week during Trump’s four years. It is noteworthy that not all of it was rightwing – and whether by inertia or design not all of it was bad – but much of it was, and the net effect was profound.

Uber drivers lost health insurance, nursing home residents could be forced into arbitration, more defrauded students will be compelled to repay student loans, and safety measures for toxic chemical exposures in the construction industry were rolled back, to name a tiny fraction.

Not to mention the invaluable data that has fueled waves of innovation and economic growth that was diverted to Trump cronies.

All of which is why the “Biden dividend” is so much bigger and more consequential than the paltry amount he gets credit for.

By Merely putting a stop to what Trump’s team had underway as they left office and then issuing “savvy” executive actions that unwound the worst damage, the Biden administration fundamentally changed the substrate of US policy. With agency staff still coming into place and reviews still underway, the most profound impacts are yet to come.

None of this is sexy.

There will be no 30-second ads about agency rulemaking, no bumper sticker slogan about fixing the gears of government.

We won’t hear much in the fall about how Biden’s team gathered data and developed ideas to smartly navigate a great geopolitical crisis.

But make no mistake: Joe Biden has already shown he knows how to tap into the greatest gifts of the American system, and has re-ignited our government engine of policy progress and economic innovation.

https://www.rawstory.com/how-joe-biden-re-ignited-our-government-engine-after-donald-trump-s-damage/

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4866 on: March 21, 2022, 12:35:43 AM »
The GOP is no longer the "Grand Old Party". It's a conspiracy cult that was hijacked by Donald Trump and conspiracy cult religious radicals along with white supremacists and various hate groups who are desperately trying to destroy our democracy wanting to replace it with an autocracy like in Russia. It's no wonder Trump and his cultists support and praise Putin, with his most loyal followers in the GOP House and Senate voting against aid to Ukraine or ending normal relations with Russia. They are all in for Russia and Putin. Their actions and words have made it obvious.   

Donald Trump is a joke. He is a career criminal and failed businessman who has been committing various financial crimes for his entire life. He caught a lucky break when he was offered to do a scripted reality tv show which made him look like a successful businessman. It was all a mirage and people bought into this phony nonsense of Trump being a "great businessman" based on Hollywood television writers.

From there, Donnie tapped into the racism and the hatred the far right had for President Obama by inventing the fake "birther" conspiracy theory. He accused President Obama of being born In Kenya and falsifying all his college degrees. That was only projection because it turns out that Donnie paid another student in College to take his tests for him because he was too stupid to pass them himself.

So, Donnie went around the media attacking President Obama demanding to see his birth certificate and the dishonest MSM eagerly gave him a platform to spew his vile and racist conspiracies. So much for the media being "liberal". If they were "liberal", they never would have given this racist fraud a platform to promote his filth.                   
Donnie's goal was to divide Americans based on race which was the Russian playbook Putin called for to weaken the United States. Donnie's entire platform was based on racial division and promoting hatred. He viciously attacked Hispanics and Asians, as we now see Asian hate crimes at an all time high thanks to Donnie's racist rhetoric against Asians. He went after muslims and even Jewish people. All of that was designed to promote chaos and division which is what Russia called for to weaken the United States. Donnie is Putin's stooge and was doing what his puppet master Putin told him to do. If you read "Foundations of Geopolitics", which is the entire Russian playbook to control the world, you can see Donald Trump has done everything that Russia called for to weaken the United States.                       

"Russia showed in Estonia, and again in the United States in 2016, that exploiting the biggest divisions — national identity, immigration, race, inequality — causes the most disruption. The more one side loathes the other, the easier they are to manipulate."
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/06/the-weekly/russia-estonia-election-cyber-attack.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics

Donnie caused great divisions in national identity, immigration, race, and inequality. His main platform was anti immigration and race which divided America even more. Donnie used a symbol of a "wall" to further enrage his rabid base against immigrants claiming he "would force" Mexico to pay for a thousand mile wall. His ignorant base actually believed that was going to happen and they still do. It was all b.s. in order to cause more disruption and division in America.

The 1/6 insurrection was another example of the chaos and violence Donald Trump incited to further weaken America and to destroy our democracy. The GOP played along and let him off the hook during his second impeachment trial. They also took part in the coup trying to prevent the rightful winner Joe Biden from accepting the presidency. Even to this day, right wingers still spread 2020 election lies and conspiracies to further damage our election process and democracy hoping to delegitimatize President Biden. All that did was give Putin a green light to invade Ukraine.

The few Republicans that did speak out against Criminal Donald were immediately attacked by Donnie and his rabid GOP cultists in Congress. They called them "RINOs" and called for Cheney and Kinzinger to removed from the party. Others were targeted to be primaried by the most far right wing extremist MAGA kooks possible. All because Donald Trump, a loser, who lost by over 7 million votes has hijacked the GOP and turned it into a cult to worship only him.     

The good news is these far right wing extremists that Trump has installed as his loyalist candidates will get blown out in the General Election and Donnie will go to prison for his attempted treasonous coup when the 1/6 House Committee finishes their investigation this fall. The bad news is that Trump has completely destroyed the GOP and Trumpism is still alive and well being promoted by the most radical right wingers in America and all around the world. We need to defeat Trumpism, every far right wing radical candidate, and current politician so we can return the GOP back to a normal conservative party once again.

Donnie and his radicals call true conservatives "RINOs" which is an absolute joke. Donald Trump, his Qanon cult, and his radical MAGAs are the real RINOs and are just projecting. These Trump extremists are not conservative nor were they part of the GOP for decades. They are opportunists who hijacked the GOP calling themselves "Republicans" making them the true RINOs. Trump was never a Republican until he hijacked the party and these white nationalists never even supported the GOP until Donnie took over the party. Real conservatives who are the backbone of the GOP have left the party leaving the GOP as an extremist cult.

In today's GOP, you are no longer allowed have a voice with a difference of opinion. You have to be loyal to one man, an orange faced election loser who is hated by the overwhelming majority of Americans. To show your loyalty, you have to cover up for his lies, protect him from his crimes, push his lies and conspiracies, be loyal to Putin, and do whatever Trump asks of you. Basically, like a mob boss and a cult leader demanding full obedience and loyalty.

This is what the GOP is...they are a cult and Trump is their mob boss cult leader. The GOP is sadly no longer "The Grand Old Party", it's an extremist white nationalist violent radical religious cult that shows it's loyalty to Trump and Putin. That's not a party the average American wants to be part of, and it's why the GOP continues to lose elections and will again in November as well as the foreseeable future.                                                     
« Last Edit: March 21, 2022, 12:50:22 AM by Rick Plant »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4866 on: March 21, 2022, 12:35:43 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4867 on: March 21, 2022, 01:40:04 PM »
News Analysis: Trump delayed weapons to Ukraine and praised Putin. Did that trigger war?



WASHINGTON — The last time (and maybe the first time) most Americans heard of Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president was at the center of a scandal that would lead to the impeachment of then-President Trump.
Trump in 2019 threatened to hold up weapons deliveries to Ukraine — caught even then in a simmering war with Russian proxies — unless Zelensky helped him dig up political dirt on rival Joe Biden.

Today, the shadow of that scandal lingers. How much did Trump’s toying with Ukraine, cozying up to Russian President Vladimir Putin and, ultimately, Trump’s acquittal on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress influence Putin’s decision to invade Ukraine?

Putin had already bitten off bits of Ukraine with the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula in 2014, and a swath of neighboring Georgia six years earlier. But nothing compared with the massive attack he launched across Ukraine, a former Soviet republic, on Feb. 24.

Numerous experts and current and former officials say Putin was emboldened by the Trump years. The former KGB officer turned president ably manipulated Trump into publicly backing his denials of having interfered — to Trump’s benefit — in U.S. elections. And, according to former aides, Putin convinced Trump to accept his claim that Ukraine was part of Russia.

It is impossible to know all of Putin’s thinking as he launched the ferocious war that has already claimed thousands of Ukrainian and Russian lives and obliterated parts of the fledgling democracy that sought to strengthen ties with the West.

By most accounts, Putin stewed in grievances for years — the expansion of NATO farther east into his sphere of influence, the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and a post-Cold War world order that marginalized Russia — waiting for an opportunity to build back his vision of a grand Russian superpower empire.

He sensed that opportunity with the election of cynical, norms-busting Trump, who at one point declared the North Atlantic Treaty Organization obsolete and has repeatedly, to this day, praised the Russian leader.

“I think Putin saw how Trump viewed Ukraine … as a pawn,” Marie Yovanovitch, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine who testified against Trump in the impeachment trial, said in a recent TV appearance. Putin saw “that we had an administration that was willing to trade our national security for personal and political gain.”

Fiona Hill, a highly regarded Russia expert who served on Trump’s National Security Council and also testified during the impeachment trial, said the former administration did take steps against Moscow on other issues, expelling diplomats and imposing sanctions. But at a “critical period,” when Ukraine was fighting Russia and needed weapons, Trump had his own political future in mind.

It sent “a message to Putin that Ukraine is a plaything for him … and for the United States. And that nobody’s really serious about protecting Ukraine,” Hill added. “And that was ultimately a sign of weakness.”

Putin watched the United States do “just about everything it could to undermine alliances and partnerships under Donald Trump,” former U.S. Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder said in a recent conference sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations. Then, Daalder added, Biden took over and talked about “America being back” and yet struggled, initially, to rebuild those alliances.

Still, Trump’s actions, and the lack of significant consequences he faced, represented a unique opening, a bright green light for Putin in Ukraine.

Trump’s impeachment — the first of two — began in the Democratic-led House on Dec. 18, 2019, and ended with a trial and acquittal in the GOP-controlled Senate on Feb. 5, 2020. It stemmed from an infamous call on July 25, 2019, that the then-president made to Zelensky, a fellow novice politician, who had just been elected.

In the call, a transcript of which the White House released after a whistleblower complaint, Zelensky pleaded for more military weaponry — including the Javelin missile systems that are now helping to stall Russian advances on Ukrainian cities. Trump agreed but said that first, he wanted Zelensky to “do us a favor.”

The favor involved investigating Biden’s son Hunter and his lucrative position with the Ukrainian oil conglomerate Burisma. Zelensky resisted, with his staff insisting on a formal request for an investigation if the U.S. wanted one. His staff also emphasized to State Department officials that Zelensky was leery about getting involved in U.S. politics.

Trump had already frozen the aid, a $391-million package of military equipment and other assistance that had been approved by Congress with bipartisan support. At least 25 Ukrainians died in fighting in the east in the weeks that followed, according to an investigation at the time by the Los Angeles Times, although a direct link is impossible to prove.

Only after members of Congress on both sides of the aisle learned about the halt in aid was it finally released on Sept. 11, 2019. It was the first time the U.S. provided lethal military aid to Ukraine, an important, albeit delayed, milestone.

“That chapter, which resulted in the president, former president’s, impeachment, sadly was an encouragement to Putin and weakened Ukraine even in this fight,” said Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), who led the first Trump impeachment inquiry.

“What Americans need to understand about that sordid chapter of our history is Ukraine was even then at war with Russia ... Ukrainians were even then dying every week, sometimes every day,” Schiff said.

“What that told Putin, tragically, is the United States doesn’t care about Ukraine, it doesn’t care about its people, it doesn’t care about its democratic aspirations. It doesn’t care if Ukrainians get killed by Russians. I think that’s the message Trump’s conduct sent, that we would use Ukraine as a political plaything.”

Schiff added that Putin anticipated if he started a broader invasion of Ukraine, he could count on Trump either to praise him or to criticize Biden.

Trump has done both.

Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, who has been critical of Trump, said it was absurd to excuse the former president or think his presence in the White House would have deterred Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

“Vladimir Putin, [North Korea’s] Kim Jong Un, Xi [Jinping] of China were getting everything they wanted with Trump,” Kinzinger told CNN on Thursday.

Reuters

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5387
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4868 on: March 21, 2022, 03:18:25 PM »
News Analysis: Trump delayed weapons to Ukraine and praised Putin. Did that trigger war?



WASHINGTON — The last time (and maybe the first time) most Americans heard of Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president was at the center of a scandal that would lead to the impeachment of then-President Trump.
Trump in 2019 threatened to hold up weapons deliveries to Ukraine — caught even then in a simmering war with Russian proxies — unless Zelensky helped him dig up political dirt on rival Joe Biden.

Today, the shadow of that scandal lingers. How much did Trump’s toying with Ukraine, cozying up to Russian President Vladimir Putin and, ultimately, Trump’s acquittal on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress influence Putin’s decision to invade Ukraine?

Putin had already bitten off bits of Ukraine with the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula in 2014, and a swath of neighboring Georgia six years earlier. But nothing compared with the massive attack he launched across Ukraine, a former Soviet republic, on Feb. 24.

Numerous experts and current and former officials say Putin was emboldened by the Trump years. The former KGB officer turned president ably manipulated Trump into publicly backing his denials of having interfered — to Trump’s benefit — in U.S. elections. And, according to former aides, Putin convinced Trump to accept his claim that Ukraine was part of Russia.

It is impossible to know all of Putin’s thinking as he launched the ferocious war that has already claimed thousands of Ukrainian and Russian lives and obliterated parts of the fledgling democracy that sought to strengthen ties with the West.

By most accounts, Putin stewed in grievances for years — the expansion of NATO farther east into his sphere of influence, the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and a post-Cold War world order that marginalized Russia — waiting for an opportunity to build back his vision of a grand Russian superpower empire.

He sensed that opportunity with the election of cynical, norms-busting Trump, who at one point declared the North Atlantic Treaty Organization obsolete and has repeatedly, to this day, praised the Russian leader.

“I think Putin saw how Trump viewed Ukraine … as a pawn,” Marie Yovanovitch, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine who testified against Trump in the impeachment trial, said in a recent TV appearance. Putin saw “that we had an administration that was willing to trade our national security for personal and political gain.”

Fiona Hill, a highly regarded Russia expert who served on Trump’s National Security Council and also testified during the impeachment trial, said the former administration did take steps against Moscow on other issues, expelling diplomats and imposing sanctions. But at a “critical period,” when Ukraine was fighting Russia and needed weapons, Trump had his own political future in mind.

It sent “a message to Putin that Ukraine is a plaything for him … and for the United States. And that nobody’s really serious about protecting Ukraine,” Hill added. “And that was ultimately a sign of weakness.”

Putin watched the United States do “just about everything it could to undermine alliances and partnerships under Donald Trump,” former U.S. Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder said in a recent conference sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations. Then, Daalder added, Biden took over and talked about “America being back” and yet struggled, initially, to rebuild those alliances.

Still, Trump’s actions, and the lack of significant consequences he faced, represented a unique opening, a bright green light for Putin in Ukraine.

Trump’s impeachment — the first of two — began in the Democratic-led House on Dec. 18, 2019, and ended with a trial and acquittal in the GOP-controlled Senate on Feb. 5, 2020. It stemmed from an infamous call on July 25, 2019, that the then-president made to Zelensky, a fellow novice politician, who had just been elected.

In the call, a transcript of which the White House released after a whistleblower complaint, Zelensky pleaded for more military weaponry — including the Javelin missile systems that are now helping to stall Russian advances on Ukrainian cities. Trump agreed but said that first, he wanted Zelensky to “do us a favor.”

The favor involved investigating Biden’s son Hunter and his lucrative position with the Ukrainian oil conglomerate Burisma. Zelensky resisted, with his staff insisting on a formal request for an investigation if the U.S. wanted one. His staff also emphasized to State Department officials that Zelensky was leery about getting involved in U.S. politics.

Trump had already frozen the aid, a $391-million package of military equipment and other assistance that had been approved by Congress with bipartisan support. At least 25 Ukrainians died in fighting in the east in the weeks that followed, according to an investigation at the time by the Los Angeles Times, although a direct link is impossible to prove.

Only after members of Congress on both sides of the aisle learned about the halt in aid was it finally released on Sept. 11, 2019. It was the first time the U.S. provided lethal military aid to Ukraine, an important, albeit delayed, milestone.

“That chapter, which resulted in the president, former president’s, impeachment, sadly was an encouragement to Putin and weakened Ukraine even in this fight,” said Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), who led the first Trump impeachment inquiry.

“What Americans need to understand about that sordid chapter of our history is Ukraine was even then at war with Russia ... Ukrainians were even then dying every week, sometimes every day,” Schiff said.

“What that told Putin, tragically, is the United States doesn’t care about Ukraine, it doesn’t care about its people, it doesn’t care about its democratic aspirations. It doesn’t care if Ukrainians get killed by Russians. I think that’s the message Trump’s conduct sent, that we would use Ukraine as a political plaything.”

Schiff added that Putin anticipated if he started a broader invasion of Ukraine, he could count on Trump either to praise him or to criticize Biden.

Trump has done both.

Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, who has been critical of Trump, said it was absurd to excuse the former president or think his presence in the White House would have deterred Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

“Vladimir Putin, [North Korea’s] Kim Jong Un, Xi [Jinping] of China were getting everything they wanted with Trump,” Kinzinger told CNN on Thursday.

Reuters

Imagine if Trump were President and took every weekend off to go to the beach and ride his bike while Ukraine burned?  He would have been impeached six times over by now.  But Joe moves on in Mr. Magoo-like bliss from disaster to disaster.  Maybe he is pre-occupied with preparing a legal defense for Hunter's pending indictment.  It makes me feel sorry for the people of Ukraine who are bearing the consequences of the media hoaxes that led to Biden's election.  Those chickens are coming home to roost in the US and around the world.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4868 on: March 21, 2022, 03:18:25 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4869 on: March 21, 2022, 11:06:43 PM »
The words from an absolute moron. Has no clue about anything except he's the "greatest at everything" In his deranged delusional mind. :D

Thank God this clown is out of power!

"You said you’d maybe do more than just send in the MiG jets. Alright. What more?"
@Varneyco pressed Donald Trump.


Here's how the former president responded:   https://mediaite.com/a/cksqk




Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4870 on: March 21, 2022, 11:27:36 PM »
Donald Trump is an absolute moron. When this joker is asked questions about simple topics he is unable to answer them because he is stupid. Only his deranged diseased mind does he think he's "the greatest".

Trump struggles to explain climate change: 'In my opinion, you have a thing called weather'



Former President Donald Trump suggested on Monday that concerns over climate change are a hoax.

Fox Business host Stuart Varney asked Trump if he believes climate change is caused by humans.

"Is the climate changing because of human activity?" Varney wondered.

"In my opinion, you have a thing called weather," Trump replied. "And you go up and you go down. If you look at it in the 1920s, they were talking about global freezing. OK? In other words, the globe was going to freeze. And then they go global warming and then they couldn't use that because the temperatures were actually quite cool and it's many different things."

"So now, they just talk about climate change," he added. "The climate has always been changing."

Watch the video below from Fox Business:


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5387
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4871 on: March 22, 2022, 01:40:33 AM »
Donald Trump is an absolute moron. When this joker is asked questions about simple topics he is unable to answer them because he is stupid. Only his deranged diseased mind does he think he's "the greatest".



Maybe ask the people of Ukraine who the "moron" is.  Under Trump no invasion.  Under Obama/Biden two invasions and thousands dead.  Record inflation, crime, gas prices, illegal aliens, and no end in sight.  But Trump is the dumb one!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4871 on: March 22, 2022, 01:40:33 AM »