A 6th floor shooting sequence and doesn't require the SBT

[John Iacoletti]

If JFK was shot from the front - and the bullet exited the back of his head - I am perplexed as to how Tague could be hit by a fragment. Okay, I admit it: I'm not really perplexed <g>.

Who said that Tague was struck by a fragment from a frontal shot?

[Michael Carney]

The shot from the front hit JFK in the throat and I don't think it exited his body.

[Michael T. Griffith]

What happened to the bullet?

It wasn't there at autopsy.

Nor was the bullet that entered the "back" of the President and is alleged to not have transited the neck.

These are peculiar bullets. Don't penetrate deep and fall out.

These silly, disingenuous questions have already been answered. They were answered in the 1990s and have been answered again and again many times since then.

If you want to talk about "peculiar" things, how about the EOP-to-right-eye fragment trail described in the autopsy report? Where is it? It's not on the extant x-rays. So where did it go?

How about the high fragment trail? Why didn't the autopsy doctors say anything about it in the autopsy report? Surely Finck and Ebersole, at least, would not have committed such a blunder as to describe the high fragment trail as running between the EOP and the right eye.

How about 6.5 mm object? The autopsy report says nothing about it. (Of course, we know now--and I mean know--that the object was planted on the x-ray; we even know how it was done.)

How about the cowlick entry site? The autopsy doctors said the entry site was 4 inches lower, just above the EOP. Were they blind? Ah, but the cowlick entry site does not appear on the skull x-rays. All three of the ARRB's forensic experts confirmed this, and a whole bunch of other doctors have subsequently confirmed it. Oops, but the EOP site could not have been hit by a bullet fired from the alleged Oswald window.

[Michael Carney]

I don’t know what happened to the bullet but a very experienced nurse said it was an entry wound.
Autopsy was performed at Bethesda and that was part of the cover-up. So a bullet from the front would not work in the single shooter scenario.
From what I have read they didn’t do much to the body, following bullet paths etc,

[Gerry Down]

I don’t know what happened to the bullet but a very experienced nurse said it was an entry wound.
Autopsy was performed at Bethesda and that was part of the cover-up. So a bullet from the front would not work in the single shooter scenario.

Technically it could have been an exit wound from a skull fragment exiting down and out through the throat.

[Michael Carney]

I believe the people that inspected the throat wound said it was a "round entry wound". An exit wound from a large fragment would have created a wound that was ill-regular in shape and the tissue would have been blown outward. It wouldn't take an expert to say it way an entry or an exit wound.

[Jerry Freeman]

Quote from: Mike Carney on September 10, 2020, 12:51:51 PM
    "The shot from the front hit JFK in the throat and I don't think it exited his body."
 

What happened to the bullet? It wasn't there at autopsy.

Let's just say--It wasn't found at the autopsy.

[Michael Carney]

And there could be a lot of reasons for them not finding a bullet but the main reason is: the coverup was going on at Bethesda, they hid the original wound with a tracheotomy. They couldn't have an entrance wound from the front, that blows the single shooter theory.