The First Shot

[John Tonkovich]

"The Official Story of What Went On Behind the Stemmons Sign"

Sounds like a thriller. Can't wait to get my hands on it.

Mr O:  your posts indicate you already possess it, as both your version and the official version are identical, i.e. nothing of import occured behind the sign.
Again, this version contradicts both the FBI's and SS's initial version.
What prompted the Warren Commission to revise their initial findings?
That's the " $64,000 Question" .

[Dan O'meara]

Mr O:  your posts indicate you already possess it, as both your version and the official version are identical, i.e. nothing of import occured behind the sign.
Again, this version contradicts both the FBI's and SS's initial version.
What prompted the Warren Commission to revise their initial findings?
That's the " $64,000 Question" .

The "$64,000 Question" is how did the SS/FBI reach their conclusions regarding the timing of the shots.

[John Tonkovich]

The "$64,000 Question" is how did the SS/FBI reach their conclusions regarding the timing of the shots.

Mr O: answering a question with a questions a nice trick; nevertheless, it still leaves the first question unanswered. Try to stay on topic, please.
Ball's in your court.

[Dan O'meara]

Mr O: answering a question with a questions a nice trick; nevertheless, it still leaves the first question unanswered. Try to stay on topic, please.
Ball's in your court.

Firstly John, I've not answered a question with a question. What I wrote is not a question, it was a reminder that you've yet to answer the question about how the SS/FBI came to their conclusions about the timing of the shots. And that's the topic of this thread - the timing of the shots - NOT running off into the hills of speculation to search for the motivations of the WC or LBJ or the SS or.......
The topic is about the timing of the first shot and for all your bluster you've provided nothing but opinion.
Argue the arguments I present in this thread, where are they weak, where are they just downright wrong and if they're wrong why are they wrong. Contribute.

[John Tonkovich]

Mr O:  your posts indicate you already possess it, as both your version and the official version are identical, i.e. nothing of import occured behind the sign.
Again, this version contradicts both the FBI's and SS's initial version.
What prompted the Warren Commission to revise their initial findings?
That's the " $64,000 Question" .

Just reposting my question.

[Dan O'meara]

Just reposting my question.

I don't know what prompted the WC to revise their initial findings

I've answered yours, now answer mine as, unlike yours, my question is relevant to this thread.

[John Tonkovich]

I don't know what prompted the WC to revise their initial findings

I've answered yours, now answer mine as, unlike yours, my question is relevant to this thread.

The first two official surveys of Dealey, with the locations of the three hits plotted out, is not relevant?
Gee, seems like important evidence to me. Z207.

[Dan O'meara]

The first two official surveys of Dealey, with the locations of the three hits plotted out, is not relevant?
Gee, seems like important evidence to me. Z207.

You're not answering the question John.
Nice try though