On The Trail Of Delusion

[Bill Chapman]

When you make up stuff, at least try to make it somewhat believable. Since you didn't, I'm sure you can show us all where exactly I said that Oswald was a print expert?

Or alternatively, be exposed, yet again, as the liar you truly are.

You missed the sarcasm. Again.

[Rick Plant]

In which the argument is made yet again that the evidence of Oswald's guilt is so overwhelming that he must be innocent.  Very amusing.  I can understand why you basically stick to playing the contrarian.  Of course, when the BY photos were taken Oswald had no idea that he would ever be leaving the murder weapon at the scene of a crime to be traced back to him through a photo. Rather, his plan was to assassinate Walker and take the rifle with him from the crime scene, hide it, and retrieve it at some later point. Which he did.  The JFK assassination scenario was not contemplated at the time of the BY photos and assassinating the president in broad daylight entails as part of the calculation to move forward with that action either arrest or death.  It doesn't matter how much "evidence" is left behind when Oswald pulls the trigger. He knew as part of the equation to do it that he would not get away with that crime. Or do you think he shows up at the TSBD on Monday morning as usual ready to move some books?  HA HA HA. 

The writing on the BY photos is that of Marina. Oswald had no apparent sense of humor and was certainly too insecure to be self deprecating The sentiment fits perfectly with Marina's amusement at Oswald fantasy of himself as some revolutionary figure. Oswald had no apparent qualms at hiding these pictures. His intent was that they memorialize him in a classic revolutionary pose. How those pictures would come to be used after the JFK assassination, he would have had no clue at the time they were taken for the reasons noted above (i.e. he was not contemplating assassinating JFK at the time).  Rather, he was building a resume to gain entry to Cuba.

Sorry, your own speculation and personal opinion of Oswald doesn't count as real evidence. How do you know Oswald had no "apparent sense of humor"? Did you know the man personally to know that?   

[Richard Smith]

Sorry, your own speculation and personal opinion of Oswald doesn't count as real evidence. How do you know Oswald had no "apparent sense of humor"? Did you know the man personally to know that?   

There is quite a lot written about Oswald and his personality by many people who knew him including his own wife.  Can you provide us with an example of Oswald's sense of humor?  Does he come across as a humorous guy to you?  I bet this was his favorite knock, knock joke:

Knock, knock!
Who’s there?
Oswald.
Oswald who?
Oswald my chewing gum by mistake!

[Fred Litwin]

Oliver Stone's so-called documentary makes the claim that another brain was substituted for JFK's. The film presents Dr. Robert Kirschner as a forensic pathologist who had serious questions about the brain. Here is your chance to read what he really wrote.


https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jfk-revisited-misleads-on-jfk-s-brain-again

[Jerry Freeman]

In reality, Eisenhower was warning American’s about the MIC’s new chief, JFK.

Paul, I've never read any account that Eisenhower was pointing that warning, directly or indirectly, at JFK. Do you have any source on that?

That is because...in reality, he just made that up. The opposite is true however----




Kennedy actually started off by firing these heads of the deep state but then they got even huh?

It was JFK who campaigned on the phony missile gap with the soviets and was telling American’s to build bomb shelters.

Just made that up too.
 

In his short tenure as POTUS, the MIC Armed Forces became the largest most powerful in America’s history.

The JFK military spending made the USA military forces second to none it's true ....so what?

[Dan O'meara]

I will spoof assassination lore as I please

Fair enough and long may it continue 

[Michael Walton]

To Jon Banks - everything you're saying here is great. You obviously have critical thinking skills and can analyze things instead of waving them away with a dismissive hand like others in this forum.

As I've said, too, for years is a lot of the folks who simply can't take their thinking further about this case is a result of extreme bias toward the Kennedys. It really does remind me of the ignorance in this country that led up to what happened last January 6. There's a lot of negativity and hatred in this country, on top of ignorance, resulting in folks simply not having the mental capacity to question things.

I just looked at that video and the vast majority of the comments are positive. The funny thing, too, is you don't have to like Stone or Kennedy to not at least question some of the more suspect evidence that was conjured up to railroad Oswald as the killer. You also don't have to accept every single conspiracy out there about this case, and as I'm sure you know, there are some real goofy whoppers out there.

But of course the usual cast of naysayers here say everything is goofy, everything is wrong. The funny thing though is if one of their own was murdered, then it'd be a totally different view. That's the real essence of this case.

[Richard Smith]

Here's one even old sour puss Oswald might enjoy:

Knock, knock!
Who's there?
Otto.
Otto who?
Otto know. I’ve got amnesia.