On The Trail Of Delusion

[Jerry Freeman]

In reality, Eisenhower was warning American’s about the MIC’s new chief, JFK.

Paul, I've never read any account that Eisenhower was pointing that warning, directly or indirectly, at JFK. Do you have any source on that?

That is because...in reality, he just made that up. The opposite is true however----




Kennedy actually started off by firing these heads of the deep state but then they got even huh?

It was JFK who campaigned on the phony missile gap with the soviets and was telling American’s to build bomb shelters.

Just made that up too.
 

In his short tenure as POTUS, the MIC Armed Forces became the largest most powerful in America’s history.

The JFK military spending made the USA military forces second to none it's true ....so what?

[Dan O'meara]

I will spoof assassination lore as I please

Fair enough and long may it continue 

[Michael Walton]

To Jon Banks - everything you're saying here is great. You obviously have critical thinking skills and can analyze things instead of waving them away with a dismissive hand like others in this forum.

As I've said, too, for years is a lot of the folks who simply can't take their thinking further about this case is a result of extreme bias toward the Kennedys. It really does remind me of the ignorance in this country that led up to what happened last January 6. There's a lot of negativity and hatred in this country, on top of ignorance, resulting in folks simply not having the mental capacity to question things.

I just looked at that video and the vast majority of the comments are positive. The funny thing, too, is you don't have to like Stone or Kennedy to not at least question some of the more suspect evidence that was conjured up to railroad Oswald as the killer. You also don't have to accept every single conspiracy out there about this case, and as I'm sure you know, there are some real goofy whoppers out there.

But of course the usual cast of naysayers here say everything is goofy, everything is wrong. The funny thing though is if one of their own was murdered, then it'd be a totally different view. That's the real essence of this case.

[Richard Smith]

Here's one even old sour puss Oswald might enjoy:

Knock, knock!
Who's there?
Otto.
Otto who?
Otto know. I’ve got amnesia.

[Bill Chapman]

To Jon Banks - everything you're saying here is great. You obviously have critical thinking skills and can analyze things instead of waving them away with a dismissive hand like others in this forum.

As I've said, too, for years is a lot of the folks who simply can't take their thinking further about this case is a result of extreme bias toward the Kennedys. It really does remind me of the ignorance in this country that led up to what happened last January 6. There's a lot of negativity and hatred in this country, on top of ignorance, resulting in folks simply not having the mental capacity to question things.

I just looked at that video and the vast majority of the comments are positive. The funny thing, too, is you don't have to like Stone or Kennedy to not at least question some of the more suspect evidence that was conjured up to railroad Oswald as the killer. You also don't have to accept every single conspiracy out there about this case, and as I'm sure you know, there are some real goofy whoppers out there.

But of course the usual cast of naysayers here say everything is goofy, everything is wrong. The funny thing though is if one of their own was murdered, then it'd be a totally different view. That's the real essence of this case.

For one thing, there is utterly no evidence of a second shooter in Dealey Plaza

And here's the real essence of this case, Sport:


billchapman_hunter of trolls_you_are_next

[Rick Plant]

There is quite a lot written about Oswald and his personality by many people who knew him including his own wife.  Can you provide us with an example of Oswald's sense of humor?  Does he come across as a humorous guy to you?  I bet this was his favorite knock, knock joke:

Knock, knock!
Who’s there?
Oswald.
Oswald who?
Oswald my chewing gum by mistake!

You are reading what other people have written about him. When people are negative against an individual they are going to write negative things.

So, you never met the man personally which is why you can't speculate using absolute statements.   

I've known several people who felt uncomfortable around a certain group of people and acted serious. When they were in their own environment and loosened up their demeanor and personality completely changed. They were joking, enjoying themselves, and were having a good time.       

[Jon Banks]

To Jon Banks - everything you're saying here is great. You obviously have critical thinking skills and can analyze things instead of waving them away with a dismissive hand like others in this forum.

As I've said, too, for years is a lot of the folks who simply can't take their thinking further about this case is a result of extreme bias toward the Kennedys. It really does remind me of the ignorance in this country that led up to what happened last January 6. There's a lot of negativity and hatred in this country, on top of ignorance, resulting in folks simply not having the mental capacity to question things.

I just looked at that video and the vast majority of the comments are positive. The funny thing, too, is you don't have to like Stone or Kennedy to not at least question some of the more suspect evidence that was conjured up to railroad Oswald as the killer. You also don't have to accept every single conspiracy out there about this case, and as I'm sure you know, there are some real goofy whoppers out there.

But of course the usual cast of naysayers here say everything is goofy, everything is wrong. The funny thing though is if one of their own was murdered, then it'd be a totally different view. That's the real essence of this case.

Thanks Michael. Great post

[Martin Weidmann]

Here's one even old sour puss Oswald might enjoy:

Knock, knock!
Who's there?
Otto.
Otto who?
Otto know. I’ve got amnesia.

See what LNs are reduced to when confronted with scrutiny of their narrative and the evidence...