Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: On The Trail Of Delusion  (Read 79076 times)

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #608 on: December 02, 2021, 04:28:55 PM »
Advertisement
So you can't come up with a single example of Oswald having any sense of humor.  Got it.  What point are you trying to make?  That Oswald wrote "Hunter of Fascists, HA HA HA" in Russian on the DeM BY photo as a joke on himself?  Do you think he thought of himself as being humorous in that photo?  My point was that the sentiment is more aligned with Marina's view of his erratic behavior.  Thus, she likely wrote.  Why don't you stick with your endless political rants and leave the discussion of the JFK case to others?

My point was that the sentiment is more aligned with Marina's view of his erratic behavior.  Thus, she likely wrote.

Your point is, as usual, nothing more than selfserving speculation for which there is not a shred of evidence. Marina did not write on the back of the DeMohrenschildt BY photo. If she had we would have known it by now.

and leave the discussion of the JFK case to others?

Perhaps you should follow your own advise..


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #608 on: December 02, 2021, 04:28:55 PM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #609 on: December 02, 2021, 04:34:42 PM »
So silly.  Playing with kids means what exactly in this context?  Did anyone ever suggest Oswald didn't like kids?  Wow.  Hilarious that you are so desperate to play the contrarian on everything.  Even when it goes against your own claim that someone other than Oswald or Marina wrote "hunter of fascists" on the BY photos.  The point being discussed was that there is no evidence of Oswald displaying any type of self-deprecating humor such as contained in that sentiment.   He certainly would not do so on the BY photos which depict him holding weapons and displaying Commie literature just before trying to kill General Walker.  I'm agreeing with you that Oswald did not write that notation on the BY photo.  Given that it is written in Russian that substantially narrows the list of possibilities in Dallas to Marina or DeM.   The sentiment sounds much more like that of Marina who found Oswald's behavior to be absurd.  And it was traced over pencil which is consistent with how Marina apparently wrote on her own personal photos.

I'm agreeing with you that Oswald did not write that notation on the BY photo.

Of course you agree. You have no other option. Even a nearly blind person can see that the handwriting is completely different from what is supposed to be Oswald's handwriting.

Given that it is written in Russian that substantially narrows the list of possibilities in Dallas to Marina or DeM. The sentiment sounds much more like that of Marina who found Oswald's behavior to be absurd.

And on and on the selfserving speculation goes on.... Again, there is not a shred of evidence to show that Marina wrote that text.

And it was traced over pencil

Which actually means that anybody could have written the ink version

which is consistent with how Marina apparently wrote on her own personal photos.

Apparently? Really... back to making assumptions again that you can not prove?
« Last Edit: December 02, 2021, 04:37:57 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
« Last Edit: December 03, 2021, 08:41:24 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #610 on: December 02, 2021, 04:35:02 PM »


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5291
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #611 on: December 02, 2021, 04:40:36 PM »
I'm agreeing with you that Oswald did not write that notation on the BY photo.

Of course you agree. You have no other option. Even a nearly blind person can see that the handwriting is completely different from what is supposed to be Oswald's handwriting.

Given that it is written in Russian that substantially narrows the list of possibilities in Dallas to Marina or DeM.   The sentiment sounds much more like that of Marina who found Oswald's behavior to be abb]surd. [/

And on and on the selfserving speculation goes on....

And it was traced over pencil

Which actually means that anybody could have written the ink version

which is consistent with how Marina apparently wrote on her own personal photos.

Apparently? Really... back to making assumptions again that you can not prove?

Instead of playing the endless contrarian how about you provide us with some explanation of how a note written in Russian is on this BY photo?  How many people, for example, who had access to this picture in Dallas could write in Russian?  That can't be a long list.  If it wasn't Marina, then who do you believe are the suspects and why did they write it?  It's not clear what you are even suggesting.  You appear to accept the photo is genuine.  Oswald himself signed and inscribed it to DeM.  So tell us what point you are trying to make here.

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: "JFK Revisited" Misleads on Guy Banister
« Reply #612 on: December 02, 2021, 04:42:12 PM »
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jfk-revisited-misleads-on-guy-banister

Oliver Stone's so-called documentary is extremely misleading on the relationship between Guy Banister and Lee Harvey Oswald. The film claims that Banister gave Oswald an office at 544 Camp Street. The evidence does not support the allegation.

fred

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: "JFK Revisited" Misleads on Guy Banister
« Reply #612 on: December 02, 2021, 04:42:12 PM »


Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: "JFK Revisited" Misleads on Guy Banister
« Reply #613 on: December 02, 2021, 05:02:20 PM »
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Evidence doesn't matter to Fred. He spins everything to support his anti-Oliver Stone narratives in his bad faith blog posts.

Online Sean Kneringer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: JFK Revisited Lays an Egg
« Reply #614 on: December 02, 2021, 06:30:10 PM »
Saint Jack vs. the Eeeeeevil CIA. That about sums it up. And did you notice that they totally skipped the head x-rays when discussing the autopsy? Gee, I wonder why.

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: JFK Revisited Lays an Egg
« Reply #615 on: December 02, 2021, 06:41:39 PM »
Saint Jack vs. the Eeeeeevil CIA. That about sums it up. And did you notice that they totally skipped the head x-rays when discussing the autopsy? Gee, I wonder why.

I assume the omissions were due to time constraints not dishonesty. They wanted to produce a TV series but Showtime only wanted a two-hour film. There's an extended version coming in February.

Dr's David Mantik and Gary Aguilar, who appear in the film, have disputed the x-rays.

https://history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/How5Investigations/How5InvestigationsGotItWrong.htm
« Last Edit: December 02, 2021, 06:48:08 PM by Jon Banks »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JFK Revisited Lays an Egg
« Reply #615 on: December 02, 2021, 06:41:39 PM »