The difference is I'm serious about debating you while you're doing nothing more than putting up a false front with unreasonable travel demands, etc...
Yeah right. A serious debate would not be about winning or losing. It would be an exchange of arguments and a willingness to be persuaded by the opponents arguments whenever they have merit. You clearly have a different goal;
But I could beat your ass any day in an online debate.
Notice how he sneaks in "an online debate". That's the weasel at work, because he knows that online he has more flexibility to manipulate the conversation than during the face to face debate I actually proposed.
Nah.
You just don't know how to read and correctly decipher the testimonial record combined with the police tapes; an obvious characteristic (and fault) of yours.
Lol, mr "Superior". You can't control it, can you now? You feel yourself to be far superior than anybody else. And yet, your entire Callaway BS has to start with a bogus claim that the witness (Callaway) was confused and wrong when he gave testimony, as if that was the only time he said it and as if his was the only witness testimony available.
No matter that the facts do not support your claim and/or that you can not produce, based on all the combined witness testimony, a coherent timeline that actually works for your claim. Come to think of it; there is a clear comparison between you and the My Pillow Guy; both make a bogus claim and constantly say they have the evidence to back it up, but never ever produce it.
The best indicator that your entire claim is bogus is the fact that you have failed completely to explain it in detail. You never got anywhere beyond a personal insult and a cop out.
I didn't go wrong anywhere. You don't know what you're talking about. Your issue, not mine. It's all in the police tapes. Go have a listen.
Learn the case.
If all else fails, you can always go check out the police tapes. They'll tell you that the body was loaded BEFORE Callaway got on the radio and the ambulance was leaving as he was on the radio.
It's all laid out for you if you just go read the transcripts of the police tapes. It really isn't my problem if you cannot comprehend what you're looking at.
Notice mr "Superior" at work?
And notice also that he went from "it's all in the police tapes" to it being in "the testimonial record combined with the police tapes" (see above). If it was in the testimonial record, he could just point to it and explain what he was talking about. He never did.... Go figure!
Instead he simply changes his story, contradicting himself in the process;
The police tapes obviously don't mention the body being loaded into the ambulance, but the tapes do tell us when the ambulance was leaving the scene en route to Methodist Hospital. The tapes tell us that the ambulance was leaving the scene as Callaway was making his report on the squad car radio.
The tapes tell us no such thing. The combined witnesses testimony proves beyond any doubt to a reasonable person that Callaway helped put Tippit in the ambulance after he made his radio call, but this is typical Brown. Make a bogus claim and never defend or explain it. Just say it's somewhere in the evidence (in this case the police tapes) and insult the opponent. And when the claim can't be maintained anymore, just modify the claim. In a face to face debate he wouldn't get that opportunity, which is why he is using excuses to run from it as fast as he can.
More false fronts.
I have never "weaseled out of a face to face meeting with you". I've said close to a half dozen times now to let me know the next time you're in the States. You know how impractical this "face to face" scenario is and therefore you count on it to make it seem like you're game, which you clearly are not. If you were game, you'd agree to doing some sort of a debate on a podcast THIS WEEK (but everyone here knows you will not do this).
I have never "weaseled out of a face to face meeting with you"Says he, while weaseling out of a face to face meeting again!
You know how impractical this "face to face" scenario is It's only impractical for you because you don't like it. You prefer to hide behind a keyboard and a screen. However, as I would be the one paying for the whole thing, it's going to be on my terms or not at all.
The sad part is that (for some unknown reason) you believe you're smarter than everyone else and you believe that no one else can see the false bravado you're putting up (with the "just tell me when and where" bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns). The reality is that everyone reading this can see through you.
The only person falling back on "technical difficulties" is you.
The sad part is that (for some unknown reason) you believe you're smarter than everyone else Wrong. The really sad part is that your paranoid mind thinks this, when I have never said anything of the kind. You on the other hand do it all the time;
But I could beat your ass any day in an online debate.
You just don't know how to read and correctly decipher the testimonial record combined with the police tapes; an obvious characteristic (and fault) of yours.
It really isn't my problem if you cannot comprehend what you're looking at.
Shall I post some more of your belittling comments or do you get the picture?
This is real simple. Debate me THIS WEEK. A host can be easily found. You won't, though.
Of course I won't. You know this, as I have said it before. It's not part of the offer I made to you and you don't get to change the rules, simply because you don't like my conditions. Your videos show clearly that you are the kind of guy who always wants to get things his way. You desperately need to control the narrative and you can't do that face to face. That's why you want to hide behind a screen and a keyboard.
