On The Trail Of Delusion

[Fred Litwin]

"JFK Revisited" Misleads on Supposed CIA support of the 1961 Coup Attempt in France
Oliver Stone's so-called documentary, JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass, misleads on CIA involvement in the coup attempt against de Gaulle. In fact, the CIA did not help the four generals who revolted. Here is the full story of the rumors and speculation from the coup attempt.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jfk-revisited-misleads-on-supposed-cia-support-of-the-1961-coup-attempt-in-france

[W. Tracy Parnell]

Very good article Fred. A lot of work obviously went into it.

[Sean Kneringer]

JFK Unsolved (Josiah Thompson's project) ain't much better.

[Jon Banks]

JFK Unsolved (Josiah Thompson's project) ain't much better.

“JFK Unsolved” is great!

It’s fine to disagree with Thompson’s conclusions but at least give the film credit for objectively presenting both sides.

JFK Revisited was great too but not nearly as fair to the counter-arguments from LN’ers.

[John Iacoletti]

I thought this Oswald photos article was interesting from over 40 years ago.
. . .
Dallas police evidently found three negatives and at least two prints. The Warren Commission got only two prints and only one negative. Besides the traces of the one Sgt. Kirk uncovered, the evidence of another negative having been seized by police was obtained by the committee from two other sources.

That's such BS.  The "blowup" was a Warren Commission exhibit, CE134.  Kirk didn't "uncover" it.  And the original negative is "missing".  Damn the luck.

Handwriting expert Joseph P. McNally agreed that it was not her writing.

Funny.  I thought "Richard" was a fan of handwriting "analysis".  But he still thinks it's "likely" that Marina wrote this anyway.  Go figure.

[John Iacoletti]

Thanks. Merry Christmas to you too.

But my difficult observation is still there. Instead of cash, why not gift me an answer?

Again, I'll go slow (my fingers are typing real slow; so it left here that way):
If Oswald is dead then the conspirators can say he admitted that the BYP were authentic. Why say he denied their authenticity? Telling the public he denied their authenticity opens the door to them being challenged. If they say - again he is dead; they can say anything (remember they're pure evil) - he admitted to taking them then we lone nutter morons can say, "But he said they were authentic."

If you prefer to send cash that'll be fine anyway.

It's always been a mystery to me why the "Oswald did it" faithful are so fond of the "a conspiracy would have done X instead of Y" argument.

[John Iacoletti]

Really pathetic.

That's "Richard Smith" alright. Let's see if the weasel accepts my challenge.... although I'm pretty sure he won't, as it would not only involve disclosing his true identity and expose the lies he's telling, but also cost him a pretty penny.

Has it escaped anybody's notice that "Richard", who usually can't wait to mouth-off, was strangely silent on this offer?  Trolling cowards like to hide behind anonymous aliases and sling insults.