Just more contrarian rabbit hole nonsense. There is zero doubt that Oswald is carrying a long package because he gets out of the car with it and walks toward the building. All the pedantic angst about how he carried it is classic contrarian nonsense in a desperate attempt to raise false doubt. There is no doubt that Oswald had the package. And that is all that matters. Frazier sees Oswald take it with him from the car and walk toward the building. Frazier is following him and sees Oswald go in the door. At no point does Frazier see Oswald discard his package (and why would he do that if it had his lunch, curtain rods or whatever he might be carrying in the opinion of these loons?). Nor does Frazier come across any discarded package even though he is just a few seconds behind Oswald in walking the same route to the building and entering by the same door. This kind of laughable, pedantic analysis of a simple event is absurd.
For somebody who is complaining about "laughable, pedantic analysis" you sure as hell are using a massive amount of speculation about what Frazier might or might not have seen.
There is zero doubt that Oswald is carrying a long package because he gets out of the car with it and walks toward the building.But there is plenty of doubt about the size of the package.
All the pedantic angst about how he carried it is classic contrarian nonsense in a desperate attempt to raise false doubt. It is in fact crucial, because if the package was concealing a broken down rifle and Oswald carried it as Frazier said he did, the package would have reached over Oswald's shoulder and the end would be next to his ear. So, the only ones who are trying to create doubt about what Frazier said are the LNs, who claim, with no evidence whatsoever, that the package protruded outward
There is no doubt that Oswald had the package. And that is all that matters.To simpletons like you, maybe...