Your star witness got a good look at a shortened bag. Saw even less of the bag while being left in the dust by the speeding Oswald.
Now let's see why Oswald's lunch would need to be palmed and shoved into an armpit. You'd think his sandwich, apple etc would be palmed at the bottom, and either folded completely or simply carried in the pocket of the jacket with "big sleeves".
Your star witness got a good look at a shortened bag. It's not my star witness. It's the only witness... and for some inexplicable reason you (who wasn't there) doesn't want to believe him.... Could it be bias?
Saw even less of the bag while being left in the dust by the speeding Oswald.The last time he saw the bag Oswald carried it in the cup of his hand and under his armpit. Do you have any evidence that contradicts that?
Now let's see why Oswald's lunch would need to be palmed and shoved into an armpit. You'd think his sandwich, apple etc would be palmed at the bottom, and either folded completely or simply carried in the pocket of the jacket with "big sleeves". I'm not interested in your opinions. You assume that the bag contained Oswald's lunch, but there is no way you know that for sure. All you do is speculating.
Here's an alternative; Oswald is supposed to have carried his rifle on a bus to New Orleans. If that's what he did, he would have probably used some sort of duffle bag, like the ones found in Ruth Paine's garage. So, if he wanted to bring an MC rifle into the TSBD why not simply use a duffle bag, rather than specially making a paper bag from TSBD materials and smuggling it to Irving?
