He was planning on assassinating the President and you think he would be deterred by the "risk" of making a paper bag? Wow. What "risk" would that entail? If anyone asked what he was doing (and who would care?) all he had to do is come up with some lie like he did with Frazier. And why are you so hung on this bag? Even if you believe there is some doubt that Oswald carried the rifle in his bag that morning (and there is no real doubt on this point) his rifle was found on the 6th floor. Only a very small number of adults had access to the location where he kept his rifle in the Paine's garage. None of those people were at the TSBD. The only person who had access to that rifle and the building where it was found was Oswald. This is not Sherlock Holmes material. If you want to believe he smuggled the rifle into the building on some prior occasion or some other way, then knock yourself out. It really doesn't matter HOW he got the rifle into the building but the FACT that his rifle was found in the building that matters.
He was planning on assassinating the President and you think he would be deterred by the "risk" of making a paper bag? Wow. He was, was he? How in the world would you even know something like that and what do you say to the LNs that claim that Oswald only decided to try to kill Kennedy after Marina turned him down?
What "risk" would that entail? If anyone asked what he was doing (and who would care?) all he had to do is come up with some lie like he did with Frazier. The risk would be that he would be noticed prior to the crime doing something unsual which people like Troy West would remember. Btw what lie did he tell Frazier and how would you even know that?
And why are you so hung on this bag? Even if you believe there is some doubt that Oswald carried the rifle in his bag that morning (and there is no real doubt on this point) his rifle was found on the 6th floor. There is not only massive doubt about Oswald carrying the rifle in a paper bag on 11/22/63, it also is by no way clear that it was "his rifle" that was found at the TSBD.
Only a very small number of adults had access to the location where he kept his rifle in the Paine's garage. None of those people were at the TSBD. The only person who had access to that rifle and the building where it was found was Oswald. This is not Sherlock Holmes material. It's indeed no Sherlock Holmes material. It's fairytale material from la la land.
Does the legal objection "assumes facts not in evidence" mean anything to you?
If you want to believe he smuggled the rifle into the building on some prior occasion or some other way, then knock yourself out. It's not what I want to believe that matters. It's what you want to believe to make the fairytale work, at least to some extent. Unlike what your usual circular "logic" suggests, there is actually not a shred of evidence that Oswald ever smuggled a rifle of any kind into the TSBD.
It really doesn't matter HOW he got the rifle into the building but the FACT that his rifle was found in the building that
matters. Backing away from the bogus paper bag speculation? But for once we agree to some extent. To make the agreement perfect all you need to do now is prove that (1) the MC rifle found at the TSBD was indeed owned by Oswald and (2) that the rifle was actually fired on 11/22/63. Can you do that?