Then went inside with the curtain rods

[Bill Chapman]

You don’t do mockery any better than you know the evidence in the case.

Who made you the arbiter as to what passes as evidence, JudgeJohnny*

*mockery

[John Iacoletti]

Why don’t you ask the other Frazier? 

Feel free to even once explain any rationale behind the pithy statements you just declare as fact, clown-boy.

[Bill Chapman]

Why don’t you ask the other Frazier? 

Feel free to even once explain any rationale behind the pithy statements you just declare as fact, clown-boy.

WOW... clown-boy?
Really? I'm so hurt*

*sarcasm

The rationale is abundantly obvious

[John Iacoletti]

The rationale is abundantly obvious

You are such an utter waste of bandwidth.

And oxygen.

[Bill Chapman]

The same old tired contrarian game of ring around the rosie.  They scoff at Oswald's having left his wedding ring and large amount of money with Marina on the morning of the assassination.  In a complete vacuum if that were the only evidence and circumstance to link him to the crime, it might not be persuasive.  Of course it is not the only evidence.  Oswald made an unexpected trip to the Paine household on the night before the assassination.  The place where Marina confirms that he kept his rifle.  He carries a long package to work the next morning. His rifle is missing from the Paine residence when searched later that day. His rifle and fired bullet casings from his rifle are found at his place of employment where he was taken with his long bag that morning.  He was seen to enter that building.  His prints are on a long bag found next to the SN on the same floor as his rifle.  Oswald flees the building and is implicated in the murder of a police officer within an hour.  In the totality of all these circumstance, the wedding ring and money take on much greater significance.  Only a contrarian fool would suggest that they are meaningless and analyze them in a complete void separate and apart from the totality of evidence.  But that is why they are contrarians.

And that's a wrap!
Good essay..

[Bill Chapman]

You are such an utter waste of bandwidth.

And oxygen.

You are such an utter waste of bandwidth.
Boo-hoo. I"m devastated.

And oxygen
hahahahahaha

And yet here you are, still posting to me after all these years

(Note that I've trashed your cartoon
You know.. bandwidth issues)
 

[Alan Ford]

So, still no one out there able to make safe a document that makes unsafe the claim that no curtain rods were found in the Depository after the assassination?



Interesting..............

[Jerry Freeman]

Earlier in the thread...

I agree ....You're right, We don't KNOW for sure that Lee denied transporting curtain rods...  However I believe he did.   I believe the curtain rod tale started with Linnie Mae Randle who had innocuously got her brother Buell involved by  attempting to get her "15 minutes of fame" when she went to the Paine residence and told the police that she had seen Lee Oswald ( who had already been reported to be the assassin on TV and radio ) carrying a long paper sack that morning.  ( suggesting that he had a rifle in that paper sack)   After that blew up in her face when the cops said that they could charge Buell with being an accessory to the crime, they made up the story about Lee telling Buell that the sack contained curtain rods.

If it hasn't been mentioned... Fritz noted that Oswald stated that he did not tell Frazier about any purpose of going to Irving and bringing curtain rods or any package to work that day.
https://jfkwitnesses.omeka.net/items/show/235     7 pages down