?

[Alan J. Ford]

On three different occasions, we observe/note evidence of a brown shirt:

(1) Mr. Mentesana's capture of the wrongly-accused still in Dealey Plaza looooong after that hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure about a phantom bus & cab ride...

(2) Mr. Brewer's description of the same shirt ----> in part (A)
Mr. BREWER - And had brown hair. He had a brown sports shirt on. His shirt tail was out.

and the specific notation--in part (B), quote, His shirt tail was out.

Right in line & accordance w/Mr. Mentesana's photo images in his home video capture of the wrongly-accused's brown shirt worn with, yes, you guessed it, the shirt tail out.

(3) Mr. Mytton's--have to give credit where its due--a photo of the same brown shirt in the photo he shared of the unfolding action at the Texas Theatre. We may as well score a hat-trick for this brown shirt because in all three cases the shirt tail was out.

We'd have a better chance of winning a major lottery jackpot than for one single individual in three different locations that afternoon wearing the same brown coloured shirt in the same fashion as the wrongly-accused.

The wrongly-accused did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.

[Bill Chapman]

MR. OSWALD: I'm innocent
MR. FORD: Okay, you can go

AKA

[Alan J. Ford]

Last post today, have to give credit where its due: for a brief moment there the Frame-an-innocent- party-committee did have the wherewithal to 2nd guess their initial ploy about merely a bus ride, realizing at some point their faulty reasoning wouldn't align w/the events at 10th & Patton due to a timing sequence issue (thus the horse manure for more expedited means of travel via taxi yada, yada, yada).

Even w/the scripted cab ride the driver, Mr. Whaley (William), clears this whole matter up rather succinctly ----->

Mr. WHALEY. I never saw what they had in there. It was all written out by hand. The statement I saw, I think, was this one, and that could be writing. I might not even seen this one yet. I signed my name because they said that is what I said.

Don't feel all alone, Mr. Whaley, this penchant for manufactured "evidence" runs rampant/unchecked in this case, amid a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to Frame an innocent party.

The wrongly accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.

[Bill Chapman]

Oswald was an ass.

'They brought me in because I've lived on a Funny Farm. I'm just a PATSY... they promised me I would be a HORSE!

[Alan J. Ford]

Contrary to the hastily contrived scripted version of the wrongly-accused's manner of leaving Dealey Plaza and at what time, the next phase of this thread will take a much closer examination/look at some possibilities/means of travel from the plaza to the Texas Theatre.

I have no quarrel w/the late Roger Craig (RIP), so in fairness I will take some time this week to review his account about observing the wrongly-accused climbing into a Rambler station wagon. I believe an eyewitness also shares an account of the same...further examination will confirm this one way or the other. I'm not personally sold on his claim, but because it stacks up much better than the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure amid manufactured "evidence" to Frame an innocent party, it merits a much closer examination.

Other possibilities come to mind, one being the wrongly-accused's ties to the Bureau during his sojourn down in New Orleans prior to his arrival in Dallas. Was he working for the Bureau as an informant? Will certainly explore this as well. We know he didn't get on Mr. McWatters' bus, let alone ask for a bus-transfer. What we don't know for sure--in spite of the horse manure spread to the contrary--is how he genuinely left Dealey Plaza and ended up on Jefferson at Mr. Brewer's Hardy's Shoe Store?

Mr. Mentesana's home video footage places the wrongly-accused still in Dealey Plaza standing on Elm Street as late as 12:48PM.

[Alan J. Ford]

*self-reminder, proceed w/caution later this week to avoid dismissing altogether Roger Craig's observations. Seems he wasn't the only one who witnessed a man climbing into a Rambler on Elm Street during the aftermath of the assassination that afternoon:

1. Helen Forrest (her observations mirror Mr. Craig's (a male figure running down the incline from the TSBD to climb into a Rambler station-wagon)

2. James Pennington (his observation mirrors Mr. Craig's & Ms/Mrs. Forest's, a male figure running down the incline to climb into a Rambler station-wagon)

3. Marvin C. Robinson (completes a natural hat-trick w/his observations mirroring W1 & W2, essentially a homerun when added to Mr. Craig's observations)

4. An employee of W3, Roy Cooper, travelling just behind Mr. Robinson on Elm Street confirmed Mr. Robinson's observations as well. What's disturbing here is Mr. Cooper's report of the same merited classified-status by the Bureau until three decades later.

*Source: Helmer Reenberg's Youtube Channel Archives. 

Mr. Craig's timing of his sighting--and the subsequent sightings above that followed-- is/are within the window of Bureau special agent Bookhout's notes revealing the wrongly-accused's assertion standing outside on Elm Street w/his supervisor, Mr. Shelley, for 5-10 minutes.

Pretty perplexing though about the driver of that Rambler being a rather large Latin man--at least to me--unless, of course, there's a connection between the wrongly-accused and the anti-Castro-Cubans; and, the shenanigans down in New Orleans was simply a ruse to reel in pro-Castro sentiments under the guise of Hands off Cuba pretense in order to ferret out unsuspecting communist-sympathizers.   

 

[John Mytton]

Contrary to the hastily contrived scripted version of the wrongly-accused's manner of leaving Dealey Plaza and at what time, the next phase of this thread will take a much closer examination/look at some possibilities/means of travel from the plaza to the Texas Theatre.

I have no quarrel w/the late Roger Craig (RIP), so in fairness I will take some time this week to review his account about observing the wrongly-accused climbing into a Rambler station wagon. I believe an eyewitness also shares an account of the same...further examination will confirm this one way or the other. I'm not personally sold on his claim, but because it stacks up much better than the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure amid manufactured "evidence" to Frame an innocent party, it merits a much closer examination.

Other possibilities come to mind, one being the wrongly-accused's ties to the Bureau during his sojourn down in New Orleans prior to his arrival in Dallas. Was he working for the Bureau as an informant? Will certainly explore this as well. We know he didn't get on Mr. McWatters' bus, let alone ask for a bus-transfer. What we don't know for sure--in spite of the horse manure spread to the contrary--is how he genuinely left Dealey Plaza and ended up on Jefferson at Mr. Brewer's Hardy's Shoe Store?

Mr. Mentesana's home video footage places the wrongly-accused still in Dealey Plaza standing on Elm Street as late as 12:48PM.

What we don't know for sure--in spite of the horse manure spread to the contrary--is how he genuinely left Dealey Plaza and ended up on Jefferson at Mr. Brewer's Hardy's Shoe Store?

And finally, thank God, we arrive at the point of no return, if Oswald didn't use some from of public transport/cab then the only option left is he was driven by someone else, someone who wanted to get Oswald away from the crime scene as soon as possible, someone who disappeared, who could this mysterious accomplice be? Da da da dumb!

I have no quarrel w/the late Roger Craig (RIP)

Too bad Roger Craig completely refutes your 12:48 timeline. Oops!

so in fairness I will take some time this week to review his account about observing the wrongly-accused climbing into a Rambler station wagon.

I'm sure you will show the very epitome of "fairness"? Hahaha! As if.

I'm not personally sold on his claim, but because it stacks up much better than the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure amid manufactured "evidence" to Frame an innocent party, it merits a much closer examination.

With every comment you dig a deeper hole, as I pointed out if someone was waiting for Oswald after his lunchbreak and such a short time after he pulled the trigger then by definition the man in the Rambler must have been an accomplice and for some reason this accomplice just dumped Oswald a few miles away? Very strange, I'd like to see you put your bizarre spin on that one?

Other possibilities come to mind, one being the wrongly-accused's ties to the Bureau during his sojourn down in New Orleans prior to his arrival in Dallas.

Wow, that came out of left field?

Was he working for the Bureau as an informant?

Even though there is zero proof and so what if he was?

Will certainly explore this as well.

I'm sure you will, I can hear the cogs whirring from here.

We know he didn't get on Mr. McWatters' bus, let alone ask for a bus-transfer.

Ironically, without Oswald's accomplice in his getaway car, the public transport option for you is the closest you will get in associating Oswald with being wrongly accused, but don't let me stop that wonderful imagination of yours, because the path you are going down only links Oswald to having some sort of foresight about the events on that blustery sun soaked afternoon.

What we don't know for sure--in spite of the horse manure spread to the contrary

Your obsession with "horse manure" is duly noted.

Mr. Mentesana's home video footage places the wrongly-accused still in Dealey Plaza standing on Elm Street as late as 12:48PM.

Wtf, where?

Good luck, young Padawan.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

*self-reminder, proceed w/caution later this week to avoid dismissing altogether Roger Craig's observations.

https://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/craig.htm

JohnM