Still awaiting an honest, objective response from Mr. Mytton...in his defense, it's not easy to convince critical-thinkers how material of higher quality (like those torn off buttons) on the wrongly accused's tattered shirt sustained considerable damage, while in contrast that mere paper bus-transfer--in spite of the same intense physical altercation with five highly adrenaline pumped officers is void of tearing/ripping...a small, but important detail overlooked amid a hastily contrived script to Frame an innocent party. Unlike the plain simple truth deception requires revision(s), do-overs, etc.
For those of you who have the time, please read the Warren Commission testimony of the bus-driver, Mr. McWatters (Cecil) in its entirety. For the record, please note--during a police lineup later that evening he does not recognize the wrongly accused as the individual who got on his bus that fateful afternoon.
There's a reason for that...the wrongly accused did not get on a bus that afternoon. There's also major timing issues within Mr. McWatters' testimony--even IF the wrongly accused was in fact on his bus. Also amid your reading pay close attention to the following three characters ---->
*The man who steps out of his car snarled in traffic, and climbs aboard Mr. McWatter's bus (sitting behind him in traffic) to announce that the president has been shot.
*The lady with a suitcase who asks for and receives a bus-transfer from Mr. McWatters (following that announcement)
*The man who climbs aboard Mr. McWatter's bus only to ride it for two blocks, who follows the lead of the lady w/the suitcase, asking for a bus-transfer as well immediately after she does.
Strange shenanigans afoot...
Representative FORD - What happened?
Mr. McWATTERS - She got off and by the time when she was talking to me that is when he got up, this gentleman here in the seat got up, at seat "M" got off. In other words, the door was never closed of the bus from the time the gentleman stepped up in the door of that there, in other words, when he said what he did, and got on back in his car, in other words, the lady got off, and the man got off, too, both at the same stop.
In other words, the bus hadn't moved at that stop.
An intelligence cut out operation?
A pre-determined signal to take a course of action?
More important than the code-speak to secure those bus-transfers for later doctoring & planting to Frame an innocent party, here's what the actual bus driver had to say upon actually seeing the wrongly accused in a line-up ---->
Mr. BALL - Anyway, you were not able to identify any man in the lineup as the passenger?
Mr. McWATTERS - No, sir.
Mr. BALL - As the passenger who had gotten on?
Mr. McWATTERS - No, sir.
There's a reason for that...the wrongly accused was nowhere near Mr. McWatter's bus, let alone a passenger on it....At the time the false-narrative amid a hastily contrived script places him on Mr. McWatter's bus, the wrongly-accused had just finished coming to the aid of Inspector Sawyer (12:34PM) inside the TSBD near the small storage room and passenger elevator on the first floor; then minutes later crossing-paths at the front-entrance of the TSBD with a rookie news reporter (12:37PM), asking where he could find use of a phone; and, of course, after pointing out a phone in the lobby to the news reporter, the wrongly accused ventures down the front steps, walks over to his supervisor to now stand outside with him for 5-10 minutes (12:42/47PM +/- 5 minutes),
essentially, nowhere near 10th & Patton...
