Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case

[John Mytton]

I don't care. The cop who called it in described the jacket as white and when the jacket was found there was bright sunlight. It was white, no matter how many games you want to play.

Mr. BALL. I show you Commission Exhibit 162, do you recognize that?
Mr. WESTBROOK. That is exactly the jacket we found.
Mr. BALL. That is the jacket you found?
Mr. WESTBROOK. Yes, sir.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Mr. BALL. I show you Commission Exhibit 162, do you recognize that?
Mr. WESTBROOK. That is exactly the jacket we found.
Mr. BALL. That is the jacket you found?
Mr. WESTBROOK. Yes, sir.

JohnM

Just one problem with that, Johnny..... Westbrook found nothing and he wasn't the cop that called it in.

[Bill Chapman]

Great, so you agree you've got nothing

As you seem to be honest for once, perhaps you can tell me where exactly did McWatters testify that "Oswald got on the bus", as Bill Brown claimed he did?

I didn't claim that McWatters testified to that.

Great, so you agree you've got nothing
You wish.

And not my bad that your reading comprehension is atrocious.
Stop twisting what I write, Sluggo.

Here, get a clue:

But it is your bad that you assume that those witness identifications are 100% perfect'
Not my bad that you assume that I think witness IDs perfect.
TRANSLATION FOR SLUGGO:
I do not think witness IDs perfect

'Roberts and Markham both said the jacket Tippit's killer was wearing was darker than CE 162'
Witness testimony is actually the most unreliable evidence there is
TRANSLATION FOR SLUGGO:
The jacket found under the car shows the witnesses to be in error

'the police called in finding a white jacket under a car'
I know.
TRANSLATION FOR SLUGGO:
The jacket found under the car shows the witnesses to be in error

[Martin Weidmann]

I didn't claim that McWatters testified to that.

Great, so you agree you've got nothing
You wish.

And not my bad that your reading comprehension is atrocious.
Stop twisting what I write, Sluggo.

Here, get a clue:

But it is your bad that you assume that those witness identifications are 100% perfect'
Not my bad that you assume that I think witness IDs perfect.
TRANSLATION FOR SLUGGO:
> I do not think witness IDs perfect

'Roberts and Markham both said the jacket Tippit's killer was wearing was darker than CE 162'
Witness testimony is actually the most unreliable evidence there is
TRANSLATION FOR SLUGGO:
The jacket found under the car shows the witnesses to be in error

'the police called in finding a white jacket under a car'
I know.
TRANSLATION FOR SLUGGO:
The jacket found under the car shows the witnesses to be in error

I do not think witness IDs perfect
The jacket found under the car shows the witnesses to be in error

Like I said, we're in agreement and you've got nothing

[John Mytton]

Just one problem with that, Johnny..... Westbrook found nothing and he wasn't the cop that called it in.

So what?

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

So what?

JohnM

His testimony, or at least the part you quoted, is a lie and worthless... But not that you care, right?

[Bill Chapman]

Mr. WESTBROOK. Actually, I didn't find it--it was pointed out to me by either some officer that--that was while we were going over the scene in the close area where the shooting was concerned, someone pointed. out a jacket to me that was laying under a car and I got the jacket and told the officer to take the license number.

[Bill Chapman]

I do not think witness IDs perfect
The jacket found under the car shows the witnesses to be in error

Like I said, we're in agreement and you've got nothing

I've got the information that the jacket found under the car proves Markham and Roberts to be in error about the jacket being darker.