See any logical inconsistency yet between suggesting that Oswald's visit to Mexico City was fabricated to implicate Cuba in the crime but complaining that the authorities ignored evidence of the involvement of anyone else and placed all the blame on Oswald? Those nutty conspirators. First, they want to start a war. But then they decided to blame it all on Oswald to avoid the war.
"They" framed a Castroite in order to justify a war to remove Castro - Operation Northwoods and all of that - and then "they" conducted an investigation that
cleared Cuba/Castro of any role. All of those allegations by people that Oswald met with Cuban agents - the "Twist Party" et cetera - were knocked down by the CIA. Oswald acted alone "they" said.
Yes, the same CIA that killed JFK and supposedly framed Oswald to justify removing Castro then helped exonerate Castro. Why would they do that? In conspiracy world all of these contradictions are fine as long as it helps promote a conspiracy.
