Who is sitting up in Zapruder @Z456?

[Martin Weidmann]

Seeing as it is a new Forum, I gave you a break, but please don't push me again.

JohnM

Already pleading for clemency?

I will push you every time you misrepresent facts or make completely false accusations.

[John Mytton]

Unlike you, I don't just believe stuff for no good reason.  All it takes is evidence, Mytton.

Guilty until proven innocent?  Is that how it works in Australia?

It was the first time that the public was able to see the complete Z film in motion.  What does that have to do with your made up statistics about "millions of CKs who say the Zapruder film shows shots from the Grassy Knoll"?

Unlike you, I don't just believe stuff for no good reason.

Whatever makes you happy.

All it takes is evidence, Mytton.

Yeah and our side has a mountain of evidence whereas your side has zero evidence of a conspiracy, go figure.

Guilty until proven innocent?

I go where the evidence takes me.

Is that how it works in Australia?

No, we have one of the best legal sytems in the World.

It was the first time that the public was able to see the complete Z film in motion.  What does that have to do with your made up statistics about "millions of CKs who say the Zapruder film shows shots from the Grassy Knoll"?

You've tried every avenue but still you fail, the video and the comments that accompany the first showing of Zapruder clearly show which part of the film had the most impact, which was only thoroughly endorsed by both Jim and Vincent and only reinforce how out of touch you really are.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Already pleading for clemency?

I will push you every time you misrepresent facts or make completely false accusations.

Already pleading for clemency?

Yes, please don't beat me masta!

I will push you every time you misrepresent facts or make completely false accusations.

Go for it.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Yeah and our side has a mountain of evidence

So you keep saying.

whereas your side has zero evidence of a conspiracy, go figure.

Even if that was true and even if that was actually "my" side, how does that prove that Oswald did it?

I go where the evidence takes me.

No you don't.  You cherry-pick and misrepresent the evidence to take you where you want to go.

No, we have one of the best legal sytems in the World.

Then can we dispense with this notion that an inability to prove Oswald innocent means anything?

You've tried every avenue but still you fail, the video and the comments that accompany the first showing of Zapruder clearly show which part of the film had the most impact, which was only thoroughly endorsed by both Jim and Vincent and only reinforce how out of touch you really are.

Again, what does this have to do with your made up statistics?

[John Mytton]

"how does that prove that Oswald did it?"

"an inability to prove Oswald innocent means anything?"

Every post from you ends up being steered towards Oswald, have you ever looked into why you are absolutely besotted with this man, it's absolutely creepy!



JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Every post from you ends up being steered towards Oswald, have you ever looked into why you are absolutely besotted with this man, it's absolutely creepy!

JohnM

And yet you can't show one single post in which John proclaimed Oswald's innocence.....

The only ones obsessed with Oswald's alleged guilt are the LNs who somehow have a desperate need to keep the lone nut scenario alive without actually ever being able to conclusively prove Oswald's guilt with facts.

[John Iacoletti]

Every post from you ends up being steered towards Oswald, have you ever looked into why you are absolutely besotted with this man, it's absolutely creepy!

Because you're besotted with the idea that he killed the president.  Stop baselessly accusing him of a crime and I'll stop pointing out why your "evidence" is lacking.

[John Mytton]

Because you're besotted with the idea that he killed the president.  Stop baselessly accusing him of a crime and I'll stop pointing out why your "evidence" is lacking.

Because you're besotted with the idea that he killed the president.

So your besotting value system is based on your perception of what I'm besotted by? Nice!

Stop baselessly accusing him of a crime and I'll stop pointing out why your "evidence" is lacking.

This is a JFK assassination Forum and it seems that you're not interested in who assassinated JFK, how bizarre!



JohnM