Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald  (Read 23330 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #40 on: July 18, 2021, 11:55:28 PM »
Advertisement
"Gun in blanket: no supporting evidence."

The FBI Lab found not a single fiber from the blanket on the carcano.....   How's that possible if the rifle had been wrapped in that blanket in New Orleans and transported from N O to Dallas and stored in Mike Paine's garage for two montha. ???     C'mon Lil Chappie answer the question.....


"Gun in bag: no supporting evidence."

The FBI lab reported that they found a SINGLE (ONE) blanket fiber on the paper bag, and there was not a trace of gun oil or any other indication that the carcano had ever been ib that paper sack that was too small to contain the rifle.   How do you explain that , lil Chappie?

You need to read my books:
!) IF HE DID IT
2) OKAY, OKAY, HE DID IT ALREADY
« Last Edit: July 19, 2021, 12:05:36 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #40 on: July 18, 2021, 11:55:28 PM »


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2414
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #41 on: July 19, 2021, 01:09:44 AM »
"Gun in blanket: no supporting evidence."

The FBI Lab found not a single fiber from the blanket on the carcano.....   How's that possible if the rifle had been wrapped in that blanket in New Orleans and transported from N O to Dallas and stored in Mike Paine's garage for two montha. ???     C'mon Lil Chappie answer the question.....

Li'l Lee lovingly wrapped the gun so nothing would snag.

Quote
"Gun in bag: no supporting evidence."

The FBI lab reported that they found a SINGLE (ONE) blanket fiber on the paper bag,

If plenty of fibers were found, you would say they were planted.

Quote
and there was not a trace of gun oil or any other indication that the carcano had ever been ib that paper sack that was too small to contain the rifle.   How do you explain that , lil Chappie?

What makes you think there would be fresh oil on a stored rifle? Is there some law?

What about the weird indents on the paper bag? The shapes near the midpoint of the bag where the trigger-guard and bolt would have been.




Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #42 on: July 19, 2021, 01:42:16 AM »
Li'l Lee lovingly wrapped the gun so nothing would snag.

If plenty of fibers were found, you would say they were planted.

What makes you think there would be fresh oil on a stored rifle? Is there some law?

What about the weird indents on the paper bag? The shapes near the midpoint of the bag where the trigger-guard and bolt would have been.





"If plenty of fibers were found, you would say they were planted."

B.S.!!! I'm not an Lner.....  I accept the facts and the physical evidence.....   Unlike a gutless LNer who's mantra is denial.....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #42 on: July 19, 2021, 01:42:16 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #43 on: July 19, 2021, 02:44:55 AM »
These delusions do not affect the evidence.

What is your problem?

Stop dodging. You called me a racist.
Now bugger off.

Offline Vincent Baxter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #44 on: July 19, 2021, 03:13:29 AM »
"Gun in blanket: no supporting evidence."

The FBI Lab found not a single fiber from the blanket on the carcano.....   How's that possible if the rifle had been wrapped in that blanket in New Orleans and transported from N O to Dallas and stored in Mike Paine's garage for two montha. ???     C'mon Lil Chappie answer the question.....


"Gun in bag: no supporting evidence."

The FBI lab reported that they found a SINGLE (ONE) blanket fiber on the paper bag, and there was not a trace of gun oil or any other indication that the carcano had ever been ib that paper sack that was too small to contain the rifle.   How do you explain that , lil Chappie?

This would be the same FBI who have been accused of (or were in cohorts with) doctoring the backyard photos, planting the pristine CE399 bullet on the stretcher, confiscating and "losing" cameras and photos of the assassination, murdering witnesses, etc, etc, and basically doing all they can to cover up any conspiracy theories connected to the assassination?

It's funny how they were capable of doing all of the above but weren't capable of planting a few blanket fibres on a rifle.

What is even funnier is how you probably dismiss the FBI's conclusion on all of the aforementioned and the fact that they concluded that Oswald acted alone after undertaking more than 25000 interviews and tens of thousands of investigative leads, and yet you are so quick to take their word as gospel and use it as 100% reliable evidence on this matter when it suits your narrative of events.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #44 on: July 19, 2021, 03:13:29 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #45 on: July 19, 2021, 05:34:26 AM »
"If plenty of fibers were found, you would say they were planted."

B.S.!!! I'm not an Lner.....  I accept the facts and the physical evidence.....   Unlike a gutless LNer who's mantra is denial.....

Bull. Even one of your ilk has a long list out of your fabrications, Fakebread.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #46 on: July 19, 2021, 05:40:58 AM »
This would be the same FBI who have been accused of (or were in cohorts with) doctoring the backyard photos, planting the pristine CE399 bullet on the stretcher, confiscating and "losing" cameras and photos of the assassination, murdering witnesses, etc, etc, and basically doing all they can to cover up any conspiracy theories connected to the assassination?

It's funny how they were capable of doing all of the above but weren't capable of planting a few blanket fibres on a rifle.

What is even funnier is how you probably dismiss the FBI's conclusion on all of the aforementioned and the fact that they concluded that Oswald acted alone after undertaking more than 25000 interviews and tens of thousands of investigative leads, and yet you are so quick to take their word as gospel and use it as 100% reliable evidence on this matter when it suits your narrative of events.

Um.. Cakebread is a CTer..

Offline Vincent Baxter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #47 on: July 19, 2021, 11:26:46 AM »
Um.. Cakebread is a CTer..

I know, that was my point.
I was highlighting the fact that CTers often accuse the FBI of wrong doing or planting evidence when it goes against their bs theory but as soon as a finding by the FBI fits their argument (in this case no evidence linking the Carcano to the blanket) they present it is bona fide gospel

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #47 on: July 19, 2021, 11:26:46 AM »