Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald  (Read 26123 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #56 on: July 20, 2021, 09:47:39 AM »
Advertisement
Well, once again you fail miserably -- ROFL

At what? Describing the nature of your shallow responses? BTW, it was your mancrush Oswald who failed miserably, Sluggo.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2021, 10:01:00 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #56 on: July 20, 2021, 09:47:39 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #57 on: July 20, 2021, 03:21:04 PM »
Dumping his best friend on the garage floor -- ROFL

Yep, and Oswald's only friend ever, who he so obviously died for. While you, Rolfie, throw yourself on the floor, rolling around laughing idiotically. Have you no self-respect? Oh, wait..

There's more: Too bad for you lot that your boy was seen shooting Tippit, rendering even just one blanket fiber in the gun bag as unassailably probative. Fancy that: The straw fiber that broke the camel's Oswald arse-kissers' backs.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #58 on: July 20, 2021, 03:32:54 PM »
Your prediction was false.

We have it on record.

Your knickers in a bunch.

Yet more meaningless drivel from yet another Oswald arse-kisser..

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #58 on: July 20, 2021, 03:32:54 PM »


Offline Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1527
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #59 on: July 20, 2021, 05:02:03 PM »
Any chance the paper was dishevelled or torn slightly, enough to see the wood?
It makes sense to wrap the rifle with paper first; then wrap the threadbare blanket around it in a kind of Marine-indoctrination 'this is my rifle this is my gun' best-friend thing.

Full Metal Jacket
Yes, that makes sense. The wood stock/end of the rifle would stick out from the paper or not be completely covered by it. And it's why he made a new bag to completely cover it when he took it to work. The paper he was using exposed part of the rifle.

It also makes sense that he would wrap it in paper to protect any oil from leaking onto the blanket and floor and also prevent fibers from the blanket potentially clogging up firing mechanism/getting stuck.

In any case, the paper explanation certainly could explain the lack of fibers on it.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2021, 05:08:42 PM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #60 on: July 20, 2021, 07:29:10 PM »
Wonderful to watch your desperation progress: he did, showed, self-explanatory.

Now you're stuck with the fibers in the bag.

Carry on.

English (or 'American' to you rednecks) isn't your first language, is it Herr Beck.  Here's some help:

Stombaugh

'Showed'
> Via his testimony

'Self-explanatory'
> Well.. not to the age 5 CTer reading-compression level apparently. Maybe I'll couch Stombaugh's blanket thing in a nursery rhyme. Assuming that you lot at least got as far as kindergarten, Herr Beck.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2021, 07:30:56 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #60 on: July 20, 2021, 07:29:10 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #61 on: July 20, 2021, 08:03:37 PM »
Ever heard of Occam's razor
This is how it works: The rifle was never in that blanket.

Ever heard of Lee Harvey Occam-Oswald?
See my brilliant 'How It Worked: The Nobody Who Shot the Somebody Had Help'
 
With, I might add, a foreward by former KGB Officer Tony Pranksetti which you can read if you can find the book.


BILL CHAPMAN

The nobody who shot the somebody had help:

1) Alek Hidell (AKA Lee Harvey Oswald) was in charge of armament procurement
2) O.H. Lee (AKA Lee Harvey Oswald) was in charge of safe-house procurement
3) Dirty Harvey (AKA Lee Harvey Oswald) was in charge of killing poor dumb cops

Dirty Harry
'Smith, Wesson... and me'
-----------------------------
Dirty Harvey
Smith, Wesson... and Lee


Alek Hidell (rhymes with Fidel) selective nutjob


Smith, Wesson... and Lee


O.H. Lee safe-house (no curtain rods needed)
« Last Edit: July 20, 2021, 09:42:04 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #62 on: July 20, 2021, 09:33:51 PM »
Your prediction and my reply are both on record for everyone to check.

Result: Chapman FAILS.

As for your arse-kisser obsession: I would advise everyone around you to watch their back.

Your prediction and my reply are both on record for everyone to check.
What prediction and what record. Cite or #FAIL#OBOT

As for your arse-kisser obsession: I would advise everyone around you to watch their back.
You lot are the ones puckering up. Back, etc? Sorry, not on my bucket list, LowT.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #63 on: July 20, 2021, 09:50:59 PM »
Never heard of it, why would anyone even care?

You really don't know what a spoof is do you.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald
« Reply #63 on: July 20, 2021, 09:50:59 PM »