Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?  (Read 44892 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #40 on: July 29, 2021, 08:49:40 PM »
Advertisement
The word I was trying to use starts with an f, then an l, then an a, then an s, and lastly a k. It isn’t a swear word at all. Whatever parameters that are programmed into the software to identify swear words is not completely accurate. That’s the point I was making.

The admins are watching*




*swiped from an animated GIF

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #40 on: July 29, 2021, 08:49:40 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #41 on: July 29, 2021, 09:22:52 PM »

Let's try to stick to the FACTS.....on page 117 of your bible  ( the WR)  LBJ's "Special Select Hand Picked Committee of venerated, and honorable men"  acknowledged that the witnesses at the scene estimated that the shots were fired in "5 to 6 seconds"......

on page 117 of your bible  ( the WR)  LBJ's "Special Select Hand Picked Committee of venerated, and honorable men" concluded that the "three shots were fired in a time period ranging from approximately  4.8 to in excess of 7 seconds"

Your "honorable men" couldn't even stick to the witnesses testimonies ......( 5 to 6 seconds) ...those "honorable men" felt they had to distort the facts by claiming the the period was from "4.8 to in excess of 7 seconds" .....

And now you're attempting to stretch the truth even more.......  Now let's knock off the lying,,,,, The witnesses said the shots were fied in 5 or 6 seconds....  And the Carcano could NOT have performed that feat.....

Oswald proved you wrong

Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #42 on: July 29, 2021, 10:50:03 PM »
Time after time I see Kooky theories that go absolutely nowhere, are contradictory and as a narrative make zero logical sense. It seems like the only reason for these paranoid delusions is just so the Ct's can imagine a conspiracy so huge it's beyond their wildest, wettest dreams therefore no effort is made to link the enormity of their claims and oblivious bliss can persist.
Following are some basic questions addressing the above and some other questions which would have made setting up your patsy so much easier, because on one hand the conspirators were extremely clever and had a ton of accurate foresight with the ability to cover up their crimes for more than half a century and on the other hand the Government were so incompetent and their plan had so many holes that even the dumbest dumbasses around here could figure it out.

Why use or plant a Mauser when you want to set up your patsy with an Italian Carcano?
Why have a shooter in front when your Patsy is behind?
Why make up a potentially easily refuted bus trip to nowhere?
Why is Ruth Paine a possible conspirator when she said she never saw the rifle, never said Oswald spoke badly of Kennedy, never saw Oswald beat Marina and never saw the long package on the morning of the 22nd, well educated Ruth could have been the most powerful eyewitness of them all but she wasn't.
Why fake the Zapruder film when to the layman it shows a "back and to the left" motion?
Why use the Zapruder film to prove stuff when on the other hand you claim the Zapruder film is faked?
Why not have a dozen people who all saw Oswald in the sniper's nest window?
Why plant a pointy bullet on Connally's stretcher?
Why use a military rifle which is designed to injure, when you are clearly trying to kill your victim because Kennedy's back wound may have been survivable with a FMJ bullet whereas an expanding bullet might have ripped his head off?
Why use different type of bullets like an exploding bullet from the front, when you are trying to link the assassination to a single weapon?
Why invent an extensive paper trail of a rifle purchase which involved many innocent people and different companies when you could just fill out a coupon and mail it?
Why not have "Oswald" just buy a rifle and continue to buy ammo from a shop and have the shop owner remember him?
Why not have more people see the long brown package?
Why not have the Police say Oswald admitted owning the rifle, having his backyard photo taken, taking a long package to work and hating Kennedy?
...etc etc

JohnM

KOOKY THEORIES HUH?  LOL 

You mean like Oswald firing an unusable gun 3x in 8.31 seconds, acculturate, running 100 feet through obstacles then taking to hide the gun..

WHY HIDE THE GUN? Leaving the shells and hiding the gun makes no sense. What's the point of hiding a gun on the same floor like the police  wouldn't find it? Not even the dumbest of dumbasses would do that!

Then run 5 flights of stairs in 40 seconds, run another 15 feet to the break room, and run in to officer Baker without even being out of breath. Even superman would have a hard time pulling that off. But there's nothing dumbass about that kooky story, right? Of course not. LOL

Here's an idea. Take video of yourself running 5 flights of stairs in 40 seconds for all of us to see, since YOU actually believe, and even defend, that idiocy. No point arguing about it when you can just show all of us how easily that can be done.


In fact, Mr. "Not even the dumbest of dumbasses..." why not shoot a bolt action rifle 3 times accurately in 8 seconds while you're at it! Show us how ridiculous are theories (or common sense) really is, Mr. Talker!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #42 on: July 29, 2021, 10:50:03 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #43 on: July 30, 2021, 05:30:01 PM »
Oswald proved you wrong

You will attribute the impossible to Lee Oswald simply to continue to make a fool of yourself.....

Lee Oswald nor any other mortal could have fired that cranky old carcano accurately even if they would have an hour to fire three shots...

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5342
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #44 on: July 31, 2021, 12:45:09 AM »
You will attribute the impossible to Lee Oswald simply to continue to make a fool of yourself.....

Lee Oswald nor any other mortal could have fired that cranky old carcano accurately even if they would have an hour to fire three shots...

If that were true, then why plant that rifle to frame Oswald for the crime?  At least be logically consistent with your fantasies.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #44 on: July 31, 2021, 12:45:09 AM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #45 on: July 31, 2021, 03:21:28 AM »
If that were true, then why plant that rifle to frame Oswald for the crime?  At least be logically consistent with your fantasies.

Pssst has the authorities convinced you that the cranky old carcano with the scope mounted askew was the murder weapon? 
If so, then all that was necessary was the ability to convince ignorant, trusting, suckers that the rifle was the murder weapon.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #46 on: July 31, 2021, 06:52:57 AM »
No one is going to be using "steamboat" because they all thought the first shot was a one-offer. Many thought a potential "backfire" or "fire-cracker". A few who claimed they knew it was a gunshot on the first report probably didn't think it would be repeated (I think a few thought it might be a boisterous Texan firing his gun into the air). With all that was occurring, I suspect no one would be using "steamboat" reckoning for shots two and three, either.

The witnesses had no anticipation that a shot spanning exercise would be needed. So how can any shot span reconstruction be anything but unscientific guesstimation?

People aren't that good at estimating time intervals, especially with distractions as in Dealey Plaza. It could be that Derek Chauvin (and maybe the three other officers charged) thought he had Floyd pinned down for a "few" minutes, not enough to kill him. But this event is the extremely rare one where we have full video that tells the whole story, that the kneeling on the neck was over nine minutes. I'm not excusing Chauvin, just offering this as a potential example of poor time estimation.

People aren't that good at estimating time intervals
I am
« Last Edit: July 31, 2021, 03:45:15 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #47 on: July 31, 2021, 03:51:26 PM »
Pssst has the authorities convinced you that the cranky old carcano with the scope mounted askew was the murder weapon? 
If so, then all that was necessary was the ability to convince ignorant, trusting, suckers that the rifle was the murder weapon.

'the cranky old carcano'
> Says the cranky old fart with multiple fabrications, well at least according to Mr Neil McKneely.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2021, 09:43:34 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?
« Reply #47 on: July 31, 2021, 03:51:26 PM »