Ct's firstly ask yourself, where does my theory go?

[Walt Cakebread]

Never mind Walt, we will just go with the measurement that you gave as at the bayonet lug: 16.68 mm, which is equal to 0.66". Using the formula for circumference of a circle, 2 pi R, we can calculate the circumference of the barrel at that point to be 2.07". Therefore 2" tape will not quite span the entire circumference of the barrel at that point. Jerry's diagrams are very useful for an experiment that I did to satisfy myself that the tape is about 2" wide and therefore the lines are about 5/16" apart. I printed the entire palm print on a piece of paper so that it closely matches the size of my actual palm. I have short fingers and LHO did not, but the size of the palm itself is what I used to compare my palm with my paper print of the palm print. The bottom row of Jerry's diagram contains two other partial prints. One is the area of the palm in which the lift from the rifle is found. I printed this on paper such that it's size matched the drawn square on the full palm print (which I had already printed scaled to my palm). This allowed me to test a scaled image of the print for fit. The creases matched well with the scaled LHO palm print, therefore it also is to the same scale as my palm. All of this gives me assurances that these images that I printed on paper are to a reasonably realistic full scale. This better image also shows the contours of the ridges (which are used for ID purposes) that form the palm print. Then I printed the other image in the bottom row of Jerry's diagram. This image shows the lift on the tape. I scaled it the same way that I did the partial palm print and compared the ridges on the lift to the ones on the palm print. They are to the same scale. Therefore, I am assured that the print I made of the image of the lift is to the proper scale. Measuring the width of the tape, it is very close to 2". Measuring the lift that is on that 2" tape I measure it taking up about 1-1/4" of the 2" width. And it measures about 2-1/4" going lengthwise on the tape. Jerry is probably correct about the rolling of the barrel in relation to the palm when gripping and/or releasing the grip. I believe that this would account for the print spanning more than half the circumference of the barrel.

Your hanging on to your beliefs in the face of ample evidence against them is typical of the nay sayers in general. As I said before, I don't expect you to change your tune. But I have proven to myself that the tape is ~2" and the teeth in the bayonet lug made the impressions (two lines) in the bottom of the barrel which showed up on the lift.

hanging on to your beliefs in the face of ample evidence against them is typical of the nay sayers in general.

Yes, that's why I've been presenting mathematical proof that you're wrong....

[Charles Collins]

hanging on to your beliefs in the face of ample evidence against them is typical of the nay sayers in general.

Yes, that's why I've been presenting mathematical proof that you're wrong....

Math that is based on bad assumptions and wrong information doesn’t prove anything.

[Walt Cakebread]

Math that is based on bad assumptions and wrong information doesn’t prove anything.

The math that was used was based on the information that YOU provided.

[Charles Collins]

The math that was used was based on the information that YOU provided.

B.S.

[Charles Collins]

And it puts a “little muscle” into his communist salute!

Good observation Jerry.

[Walt Cakebread]

EXCELLENT PHOTO ....Dufus!



The photo shows that if Lee had a 5/8 inch carcano barrel in his hand he barrel would not have been in contact with the palm of his hand.    OPEN your eyes and LOOK!    His little finger is pushed into the very spot that you yokels have said was in contact with the barrel.   

[Charles Collins]

EXCELLENT PHOTO ....Dufus!



The photo shows that if Lee had a 5/8 inch carcano barrel in his hand he barrel would not have been in contact with the palm of his hand.    OPEN your eyes and LOOK!    His little finger is pushed into the very spot that you yokels have said was in contact with the barrel.   

Why do you suppose that is? Could it be that it’s because the barrel isn’t in his hand?