Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear  (Read 17240 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #16 on: August 06, 2021, 12:19:58 AM »
Advertisement
Wasn't the Walker bullet steel jacketed?

Mr. EISENBERG - Can you think of any reason why someone might have called this a steel-jacketed bullet?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; except that some individuals commonly refer to rifle bullets as steel-jacketed bullets, when they actually in fact just have a copper-alloy jacket.


 Thumb1:

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #16 on: August 06, 2021, 12:19:58 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #17 on: August 06, 2021, 12:27:55 AM »
Most LNers think the first shot (most believe it to be a miss) occurred before a point in the Zapruder film much earlier than that suggested by the Warren Commission. There's also some confidence in the SBT occurring in the early-Z220s, something the Commission didn't argue. The Odio Sisters claim and Ruby at Parkland are considered by some LNers as plausible.

Beyond the Commission, most LNers believe the more-refined ballistics analysis and 3D recreation confirm the SBT and head shot. The work of the HSCA and Professor Hany Farid proved the Backyard Photos were authentic.

What do the CTs have? Public opinion based on most people not examining the case. Photos of varying resolution and time intervals that "show" two different Lees, Marguerites and Babushka Ladies. Ruby lookalike shooting Oswald. Greer shooting Kennedy. Vicki Adams doing Olympic-style sprinting in three-inch heels. Endless semantics about clipboards, the lunchroom encounter and the Man in the Doorway. Being the laughingstock of the Internet.

Yep, that sums it up, the WC/HSCA supporters endorse science and deductive reasoning whereas the CT's believe in Voodoo and extreme paranoia.

JohnM

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #18 on: August 06, 2021, 01:00:16 AM »

What solid proof do you have that PROVES an attempt was made to kill Walker?

The same camera that took Oswald family photos and the backyard photos also took multiple photos of the Walker residence about a month before the attempted assassination.





In Oswald's possession was a bus map that had large cross on Walkers house.



At about the same time Oswald penned a letter to Marina in what to do after Oswald was captured.





The window frame that deflected the Walker bullet.



JohnM
« Last Edit: August 06, 2021, 01:05:57 AM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #18 on: August 06, 2021, 01:00:16 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #19 on: August 06, 2021, 06:29:41 AM »
Mr. EISENBERG - Can you think of any reason why someone might have called this a steel-jacketed bullet?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; except that some individuals commonly refer to rifle bullets as steel-jacketed bullets, when they actually in fact just have a copper-alloy jacket.


LOL.  Who are these individuals who commonly do this?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2021, 06:30:52 AM »
The same camera that took Oswald family photos and the backyard photos also took multiple photos of the Walker residence about a month before the attempted assassination.

Great - convict the camera then.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2021, 06:30:52 AM »


Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5309
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #21 on: August 06, 2021, 07:32:58 PM »
Awesome idea by Oswald not to date the letter or name the target.

Then he could reuse the letter whenever he felt like assassinating somebody.

Um, where did he leave it on the 22nd?

Or maybe he was smarter than yourself (no difficult task).  Why would he need to "name the target" or "date the letter." HA HA HA.  He is telling his wife what to do if he is arrested or killed.   So now think real hard.  What was Oswald doing at this time that might lead to his arrest or murder that night?  Was his typing class that dangerous?  Weak sauce.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #22 on: August 06, 2021, 09:06:47 PM »
But somehow "Richard" knows that an unsigned undated letter in Russian that doesn't mention Walker or shooting is definitely about Oswald shooting Walker.

 ::)
« Last Edit: August 06, 2021, 09:07:14 PM by John Iacoletti »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3779
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #23 on: August 06, 2021, 10:40:10 PM »
Awesome idea by Oswald not to date the letter or name the target.

Then he could reuse the letter whenever he felt like assassinating somebody.

Um, where did he leave it on the 22nd?

If I remember correctly, Marina said that she retained the letter after the Walker incident. So, it appears that LHO would have had to write another one for the JFK assassination. By then, Marina was staying with Ruth and the contents of a similar letter would need to be revised accordingly or just not be necessary, because Ruth would be able to assist Marina.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #23 on: August 06, 2021, 10:40:10 PM »