Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear  (Read 17238 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #96 on: August 20, 2021, 09:58:46 PM »
Advertisement
Oswald just happened to have a Carcano rifle

Says who?

Quote
and it just happened to have a couple of notches that sorta' resembled the ones on the rifle recovered from the sniper's nest.

"Couple of"?

Quote
But, no, they were different. "It doesn't look the same". The experts were wrong. Because "LOL."

What the "expert" actually said was "tilt the scales in the direction".  Because moon craters.

Quote
Sure, maybe they were wrong. But just dismissing it with the juvenile "LOL" isn't showing it.

The burden is on the claimant to prove his case.

Quote
Poor Oswald. He just decided to leave his money to Marina that day, he just decided to leave his wedding ring, he just decided to bring curtain rods to work, he just decided to leave the building shortly after the assassination, he just decided to go see a move and not watch the TV, he just decided, he just decided, he just decided, he just decided.....

If that's not evidence of murder then I don't know what is!   :D

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #96 on: August 20, 2021, 09:58:46 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #97 on: August 20, 2021, 10:02:25 PM »
Yeah, the overuse of "LOL" when something isn't even remotely funny has greatly diminished the impact that the acronym originally had and now being used as a cheap gag when they have no other answer is simply a product of a juvenile mind that's run out of ideas.

What's cheap and juvenile is the overuse of terms like "Oswald's rifle" as if it were a fact.

also thinking that asking a bunch of "why did Oswald do X?" questions as if that constitutes evidence of anything.

"hiding in the darkened Texas Theatre".  LOL.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #98 on: August 21, 2021, 12:51:11 AM »
What's cheap and juvenile is the overuse of terms like "Oswald's rifle" as if it were a fact.

also thinking that asking a bunch of "why did Oswald do X?" questions as if that constitutes evidence of anything.

"hiding in the darkened Texas Theatre".  LOL.


asking a bunch of "why did Oswald do X?" questions as if that constitutes evidence of anything.

Often the,... Why did Oswald do X ?...isn't even something he actually did.   Example....Why did Lee Oswald disassemble the carcano and conceal it in a paper bag?   

There is no evidence that Lee disassembled the carcano.....  If he had done that ...His finger prints would have been all over the parts and pieces of the rifle when the FBI examined the rifle.  They found No prints that could be identified with anybody on the rifle.

The evidence indicates that Lee could not have carried a disassembled carcano in the paper sack that Buell Frazier said he saw on the seat of his 1953 Chevy.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Carcano: What Oswald Apologists don't want to hear
« Reply #98 on: August 21, 2021, 12:51:11 AM »