Most of this is retread. But I wanted to single this one statement out:
Mitch Todd's claim that Adams and Styles stayed on the 4th floor until at least 12:36, when police began locking down the building and an officer told Adams to return to the building is destroyed by the testimony of Officer Barnett, who ran to the back of the building, after hearing the shots and saw officers searching the railroad cars, which means there were officers in the railway yard prior to the building being locked down.
I have no idea why Weidmann thinks that Barnett's testimony "destroys" anything. While he says that he "looked behind the building and I saw officers searching the railroad cars," he also said "but there was no sign they were going into the building or watching the building, so I decided I was the only one watching the building."
So the guys that Barnett sees in the rail yards aren't interested in the TSBD, or in watching it, which is what Martin needs to happen. The Darnell and Martin films show the law enforcement activity west of the Depository in the immediate aftermath of the assassination; it's focused on the North-South tracks west of Bower's tower, not near the TSBD. The Darnell film also shows the cars being searched, a line of passenger cars west of the parking lot.
Then it gets kind of confusing:
Mr. BARNETT: "...So since this was the only fire escape and there were officers down here watching the this back door, I returned back around to the front to watch the front of the building and the fire escape. Then I decided maybe I had been wrong, so I saw the officers down here searching."
Mr. LIEBELER: You mean the officers went on down toward No. 5 on your Exhibit No. 354?
The Number "5" on CE354 is at the West end of Old Elm, BTW.
So, Barnett first says that he's the only guy watching the back of the building, then says there were other officers watching the back door. That doesn't exactly make sense to begin with, but it leads to another problem aside from the self-contradiction. Multiple officers at the rear of the Depository would imply that this was much later on, when there were enough officers to put a team of guys out back.
I have no idea why Weidmann thinks that Barnett's testimony "destroys" anything. Of course you don't. You're an LN and will never accept anything that does not match your narrative.
So the guys that Barnett sees in the rail yards aren't interested in the TSBD, or in watching itAnd there's another one of Todd's selfserving, yet erroneous, assumptions. The fact of the matter is that Barnett confirms that there were policemen behind the TSBD within two minutes of the shooting. Todd doesn't know what they were interested in and I would argue they were most likely interested in anything and everything out of the ordinary, like for instance a guy running out the back of a building. But none of that really matters.
They don't have to be particularly interested in the TSBD, nor is it a requirement for a cop at a crime scene, to be particularly interested in something, to tell some civilians what to do or where to go. There is nothing irregular or strange about a cop who sees two women coming from a building telling them to go back to that building. And that's exactly what happened to Adams and Styles. If the cop had been part of some lock down team, as Todd prefers to claim, he would have told them to go back in the same way they came out. But as this was a cop checking out the railway area, he had no problem with Adams and Styles going to the front of the building after he told them to return to the building.
The Darnell and Martin films show the law enforcement activity west of the Depository in the immediate aftermath of the assassination; it's focused on the North-South tracks west of Bower's tower, not near the TSBD. And there's is yet another assumption. Unless the Darnell and Martin films show us all the cops in the railway area, you don't know where, if anywhere in particular, the search was focused on, nor do you know if there were officers near the TSBD that were not recorded on film.
No matter how much you want to twist and turn this thing, Barnett is clear; after the shots he ran away from Elm, down Houston, mainly watching the fire escape of the TSBD. When he came near the back of the building he saw other officers and then ran back to the corner of Elm and Houston where he arrived an estimated 2,5 minutes after the shots. The meaning of this is simple; there were officers behind the TSBD within two minutes of the shots.
So, Barnett first says that he's the only guy watching the back of the building, then says there were other officers watching the back door. That doesn't exactly make sense to begin with, but it leads to another problem aside from the self-contradiction. Multiple officers at the rear of the Depository would imply that this was much later on, when there were enough officers to put a team of guys out back. And yet again another selfserving assumption. How in the world does Barnett saying that there were officers watching the back door imply that it was much later on? The answer is of course that it doesn't. When Barnett talks about officers he could be speaking about as little as two men.
Btw where does Barnett actually say that he was the only guy watching
the back of the building? In his testimony he said he thought he was the only one watching the building, but that was after he saw officers in the front, going west on Old Elm street, who he believed were not entering or watching the building.
Also, there is no contradiction in what Barnett said.
Mr. BARNETT - I went looked behind the building and I saw officers searching the railroad cars. I looked around in front towards the front of the building and I saw officers going west.
Mr. LIEBELER - Going west down the little street there in front of the School Book Depository Building?
Mr. BARNETT - Yes; but there was no sign they were going into the building or watching the building, so I decided I was the only one watching the building. So since this was the only fire escape and there were officers down here watching the this back door, I returned back around to the front to watch the front of the building and the fire escape. Then I decided maybe I had been wrong, so I saw the officers down here searching.
Barnett clearly says he was looking
towards the front of the building when he saw officers who he believed were not going into the building or even watching the building. As he had seen officers watching the back door (presumably of the TSBD) he ran to the front of the building and then decided he had been wrong about no officers going inside the building or watching it
at the front