Wecht probably just had bullets fired that arrived at the impact site nose-on and at full-velocity. Those will disintegrate and mushroom.
No, they used an FMJ bullet.
Plus, the front-shirt slits have no fabric missing and tested negative for any traces of metal when the FBI tested them, and we now know that the autopsy absolutely established that the back wound had no exit point and that the first two drafts of the autopsy report said nothing about a bullet exiting the throat.
But the SBT has the bullet that caused Connally's wounds slow-downed and tumbling.
Which is absurd. The throat wound was small and punched in, and the entry wound in Connally's back was the same length as JFK's rear head entry wound (1.5 cm) and only 0.2 cm taller. No one suggests that the rear-head-entry-wound bullet was "tumbling." No, it simply entered the skull at an angle, just as did the bullet that struck Connally's back.
Plus, the front-shirt slits have no fabric missing and tested negative for any traces of metal when the FBI tested them, and we now know that the autopsy absolutely established that the back wound had no exit point and that the first two drafts of the autopsy report said nothing about a bullet exiting the throat.
The slowing-down and tumbling (along with more as the bullet went through the "Connally" torso) resulted in a bullet that, having struck two hard tissue obstructions, was similar to CE399.
Hogwash. The WC's wound ballistics tests destroyed the SBT.
The initial belief at autopsy that the back wound had no exit (though it bothered the pathologists at the time) didn't come out of the ARRB hearings. It was recorded in the 1963 Silbert-O'Neill Report, made by two FBI agents present at the autopsy. Humes revised the Autopsy Report over the weekend after a phone conservation with Dr. Perry of Parkland Hospital.
You're misleading people again. The ARRB materials strongly confirm the Sibert-O'Neill report, as does Dr. Canada's posthumously published interview with Dr. Kurtz. As you well know, since I just proved this to you a few days ago, Sibert and O'Neill provided important additional information on the back-wound and its probing in their ARRB interviews. Why didn't you mention that?
Plus, the front-shirt slits have no fabric missing and tested negative for any traces of metal when the FBI tested them, and we now know that the autopsy absolutely established that the back wound had no exit point and that the first two drafts of the autopsy report said nothing about a bullet exiting the throat.
The bullet can easily pass from the back wound to the neck outshoot without striking bone. The missile channel will cause a great deal of pressure; in this case, there was bruising across the top of the right lung. The T1 transverse process had a non-displaced fracture, possibly caused by the passing of the bullet.
Nonsense and distortion. You are mischaracterizing the damage and the bruising. Look at Dr. Mantik's CT scans.
Plus, the front-shirt slits have no fabric missing and tested negative for any traces of metal when the FBI tested them, and we now know that the autopsy absolutely established that the back wound had no exit point and that the first two drafts of the autopsy report said nothing about a bullet exiting the throat.
A neck wound above the shirt collar wouldn't match the wound location shown in the autopsy photo.
You know this is wrong. We've been through this before. Any number of photos of JFK wearing a shirt and tie show that you are wrong. Why do you keep repeating claims that you know are false?
Plus, the front-shirt slits have no fabric missing and tested negative for any traces of metal when the FBI tested them, and we now know that the autopsy absolutely established that the back wound had no exit point and that the first two drafts of the autopsy report said nothing about a bullet exiting the throat.
In the motorcade, was the tie knot slightly off to the left?
The tie knot would have had to be off center by a lot more than "slightly" for the bullet to avoid going through it or to avoid nicking one of its edges. The FBI fought tooth and nail to avoid releasing the evidence photos of the tie, but Weisberg finally got them, and they destroy the SBT, but you folks just won't admit it.
Furthermore, the front shirt slits are clearly below where the tie knot would have been.
Plus, the front-shirt slits have no fabric missing and tested negative for any traces of metal when the FBI tested them, and we now know that the autopsy absolutely established that the back wound had no exit point and that the first two drafts of the autopsy report said nothing about a bullet exiting the throat.