Opinions are not proof.
Multiple credible witnesses see a white male pointing a rifle from the SN towards the President at the time of the assassination.
More credible witnesses see a white male in the SN just before the assassination.
Multiple witnesses report seeing a rifle at the SN window.
3 clearly audible shots are heard from the vast majority of witnesses.
3 shells are found by the first officers to discover the SN
Multiple witnesses inside the TSBD report that the sound of the shots came from inside the TSBD.
In the official narrative all this applies to Oswald.
Who was the white male with the rifle?
Personally, I believe Jack Dougherty was the man with the rifle. I believe the available evidence favours this identification.
Believing is something you do in church.
And this from the guy who wants evidence up front for a hypothesis, which normally is the starting point of an investigation to find out if there is evidence to support it. Hilarious! Sorry Dan, but you blew it big time.
Are you still here Mr Evidence?
Mr "Jim Braden" and "it's possible maybe the trajectory came from the Dal-Tex perhaps"
Now you've been outed why don't you run along and play with your tinfoil friends.
Some of us are trying to get to the bottom of what happened, rather than parasite off the work of others.
Has it ever crossed your mind to actually contribute?
Multiple credible witnesses see a white male pointing a rifle from the SN towards the President at the time of the assassination.
More credible witnesses see a white male in the SN just before the assassination.
Multiple witnesses report seeing a rifle at the SN window.
3 clearly audible shots are heard from the vast majority of witnesses.
3 shells are found by the first officers to discover the SN
Multiple witnesses inside the TSBD report that the sound of the shots came from inside the TSBD.
In the official narrative all this applies to Oswald.
You miss out the majority of my post and leave in the bit that might also apply to Oswald.
Aren't you a clever boy.
Believing is something you do in church. I believe you have nothing to offer yet I don't find myself in a church!
A theory is not proof. It is something that must be "believed in".
It is an interpretation of the available evidence.
Over the posts I've made on this thread I've presented a wealth of evidence that guides my interpretation of events.
You have provided nothing.
Which is more than you usually provide.